History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles
394 U.S. 102
| SCOTUS | 1969
|
Check Treatment

394 U.S. 102

89 S.Ct. 926

22 L.Ed.2d 112

Eugene HOLDEN et al.
v.
Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al.

No. 945.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1969

Burton Marks, for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.

Case Details

Case Name: Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 3, 1969
Citation: 394 U.S. 102
Docket Number: 945
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.