History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co. Of Texas
391 U.S. 366
| SCOTUS | 1968
|
Check Treatment

391 U.S. 366

88 S. Ct. 1665

20 L. Ed. 2d 640

BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. et al.
v.
STANDARD OIL CO. OF TEXAS et al.

No. 503.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

May 20, 1968

Edwin F. Russell and Barbara M. Suchow, for petitioner Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons, for petitioner Long Island Lighting Co.

Kent H. Brown, for petitioner Public Service Commission of the State of New York.

Martin N. Erck and Frank S. Troidl, for respondent Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson and Donald K. Young, for respondent Hunt.

Sherman S. Poland, for respondent Coates.

Robert V. Smith, for respondent Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.

J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for respondent Clark Fuel Producing Co.

William K. Tell, Jr., William R. Slye and James D. Annett, for respondent Texaco, Inc.

Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May and Francis H. Caskin, for respondent Sun Oil Co.

Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for respondent Sunray DX Oil Co.

Richard F. Remmers, for respondent Sohio Petroleum Co.

Kiel Boone, for respondent Cox.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., 391 U.S. 9, 88 S. Ct. 1526, 20 L. Ed. 2d 388.

2

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co. Of Texas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 27, 1968
Citation: 391 U.S. 366
Docket Number: 503
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.