History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blankenship v. Holding
387 U.S. 95
| SCOTUS | 1967
|
Check Treatment
387 U.S. 95 (1967)

BLANKENSHIP ET AL.
v.
HOLDING, DBA GRAND NEWS.

No. 1089.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 15, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.

Case Details

Case Name: Blankenship v. Holding
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 15, 1967
Citation: 387 U.S. 95
Docket Number: 1089
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.