History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holding v. Blankenship
387 U.S. 94
| SCOTUS | 1967
|
Check Treatment
387 U.S. 94 (1967)

HOLDING, DBA GRAND NEWS
v.
BLANKENSHIP ET AL.

No. 1088.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 15, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Probable jurisdiction noted as to Question 1. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is reversed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be constitutional. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58. Treating the nonappealable issue presented by Question 2 as if contained in a petition for a writ of certiorari, the petition is denied. See Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502, 512.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the denial of certiorari as to Question 2, but would affirm the judgment of the District Court as to Question 1.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Case Details

Case Name: Holding v. Blankenship
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 15, 1967
Citation: 387 U.S. 94
Docket Number: 1088
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.