History
  • No items yet
midpage
Whisman v. Georgia
16 L. Ed. 2d 1001
| SCOTUS | 1966
|
Check Treatment
384 U.S. 895 (1966)

WHISMAN
v.
GEORGIA.

No. 1381, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 20, 1966.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.

Reuben A. Garland and Beryl H. Weiner for appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. Arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. Arizona. See dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.

Case Details

Case Name: Whisman v. Georgia
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 20, 1966
Citation: 16 L. Ed. 2d 1001
Docket Number: 1381 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.