History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hainsworth v. Martin
382 U.S. 109
| SCOTUS | 1965
|
Check Treatment
382 U.S. 109 (1965)

HAINSWORTH
v.
MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL.

No. 477.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 15, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.

Robert W. Hainsworth, appellant, pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, Pat Bailey and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Hainsworth v. Martin
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 22, 1965
Citation: 382 U.S. 109
Docket Number: 477
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.