History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ruark v. Colorado
12 L. Ed. 2d 1042
| SCOTUS | 1964
|
Check Treatment
378 U.S. 585 (1964)

RUARK
v.
COLORADO.

No. 1173, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.

Case Details

Case Name: Ruark v. Colorado
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 22, 1964
Citation: 12 L. Ed. 2d 1042
Docket Number: 1173 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.