History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Crouse
12 L. Ed. 2d 1039
| SCOTUS | 1964
|
Check Treatment
378 U.S. 584 (1964)

SMITH
v.
CROUSE, WARDEN.

No. 915, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U.S. 998.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Crouse
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 22, 1964
Citation: 12 L. Ed. 2d 1039
Docket Number: 915 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.