History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shockey v. Illinois
1963 U.S. LEXIS 531
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment
375 U.S. 22 (1963)

SHOCKEY
v.
ILLINOIS.

No. 20, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 14, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

John R. Snively for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Case Details

Case Name: Shockey v. Illinois
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 14, 1963
Citation: 1963 U.S. LEXIS 531
Docket Number: 20 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.