History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daegele v. Kansas
11 L. Ed. 2d 44
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment
375 U.S. 1 (1963)

DAEGELE
v.
KANSAS.

No. 72, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 14, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, should be applied retroactively.

Case Details

Case Name: Daegele v. Kansas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 14, 1963
Citation: 11 L. Ed. 2d 44
Docket Number: 72 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.