History
  • No items yet
midpage
Price v. Moss
374 U.S. 103
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment
374 U.S. 103 (1963)

PRICE ET AL.
v.
MOSS ET AL.

No. 688.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1963.[*]
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for appellants in No. 688.

Frank Carter for appellants in No. 689.

Norman E. Reynolds, Jr. and Sid White for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed as the order of the District Court is not appealable under 28 U. S. C. § 1253.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the result.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 689, Oklahoma Farm Bureau et al. v. Moss et al., on appeal from the same Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Price v. Moss
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 10, 1963
Citation: 374 U.S. 103
Docket Number: Nos. 688 and 689
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.