History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
1963 U.S. LEXIS 1554
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment

373 U.S. 372

83 S.Ct. 1312

10 L.Ed.2d 419

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. et al.
v.
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. MARYLAND PORT AUTHORITY et al. v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al.

Nos. 97, 98, and 99.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 1963

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1963.

See 374 U.S. 859, 83 S.Ct. 1862.

Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D. C., Jervis Langdon, Jr., and William L. Marbury, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.

J. William Doolittle, Washington, D. C., Thomas E. Dewey, New York City, and Robert G. Bleakney, Jr., Sudbury, Mass., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

2

Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 17, 1963
Citation: 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1554
Docket Number: 97
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.