History
  • No items yet
midpage
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.
10 L. Ed. 2d 126
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment

372 U.S. 710

83 S.Ct. 1020

10 L.Ed.2d 126

Nathan Boyd HOLMES
v.
CALIFORNIA et al.

No. 70, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 1963

Holmes, pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen. of California, and William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814.

2

Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 358. 360, 83 S.Ct. 817, 818.

3

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 15, 1963
Citation: 10 L. Ed. 2d 126
Docket Number: 70 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.