History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGrath v. Rhay
364 U.S. 279
| SCOTUS | 1960
|
Check Treatment
364 U.S. 279 (1960)

McGRATH ET AL.
v.
RHAY, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.

No. 720.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 27, 1960.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.

Petitioners pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent's motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari is denied. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.

Case Details

Case Name: McGrath v. Rhay
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 27, 1960
Citation: 364 U.S. 279
Docket Number: 720
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.