History
  • No items yet
midpage
Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo
302 U.S. 736
| SCOTUS | 1937
|
Check Treatment

302 U.S. 736

58 S. Ct. 122

82 L. Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.*

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

1

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

2

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

3

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

4

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S. Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.

Case Details

Case Name: Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 25, 1937
Citation: 302 U.S. 736
Docket Number: 411
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.