Wis. Admin. Code § Tax 3.05
(2) Definitions. In this section and in ss. 71.05 (6) (b) 47m., 71.26 (1) (h), and 71.45 (1) (c), Stats.:
(4) Average employee count. The average employee count for purposes of determining the increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees employed by the taxpayer in this state for a taxable year shall be computed using one of the following methods:
(a)
1. Except as provided in subd. 2., for a taxable year during which the taxpayer is required, under ch. 108, Stats., to file quarterly unemployment insurance wage reports with the department of workforce development, the average employee count shall be computed using the average number of full-time equivalent employees employed by the taxpayer in this state from the claimant’s quarterly wage reports required to be filed during the taxable year. An amount computed under this subdivision shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Example: For Taxpayer A’s taxable year beginning August 1, 2011 and ending July 31, 2012, Taxpayer A uses the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees employed in Wisconsin from the quarterly wage reports required to be filed October 31, 2011, January 31, 2012, April 30, 2012, and July 31, 2012 to compute the average employee count. The information from the reports filed is as follows:
The average employee count in this example is 40, the sum of the full-time equivalent employees employed in Wisconsin reported (160) divided by the number of reports filed (4).
(b)
1. Except as provided in subds. 2. and 3., for a taxable year during which a taxpayer is not required under ch. 108, Stats., to file quarterly unemployment insurance wage reports with the department of workforce development, the average employee count shall be computed using the average number of full-time equivalent employees employed by the taxpayer in this state on January 31, April 30, July 31, and October 31 within the taxable year. A January 31, April 30, July 31, or October 31 that does not occur within the taxable year is disregarded for purposes of the computation under this subdivision. An amount computed under this subdivision shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Example 1) For Taxpayer B’s taxable year beginning July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012, the number of full-time equivalent employees employed by Taxpayer B in this state on July 31, 2011, October 31, 2011, January 31, 2012, and April 30, 2012, are used to compute the average employee count.
Example 2) To compute the average employee count for Taxpayer C’s short-period taxable year beginning March 15, 2011, and ending December 31, 2011, Taxpayer C divides the sum of the number of full-time equivalent employees employed by Taxpayer C in this state on April 30, 2011, July 31, 2011, and October 31, 2011, by three.
(5) Partnerships, limited liability companies, and tax-option corporations. Partnerships, limited liability companies, and tax-option corporations may not claim the job creation deduction under ss. 71.05 (6) (b) 47m., 71.26 (1) (h), or 71.45 (1) (c), Stats., but the eligibility for, and the amount of, the deduction shall be based on the increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees employed by the partnership, limited liability company, or tax-option corporation in this state and the gross receipts of the partnership, limited liability company, or tax-option corporation. A partnership, limited liability company, or tax-option corporation shall compute the amount of deduction that each of its partners, members, or shareholders may claim and shall provide that information to each of them.
Example: Partnership C has two equal partners, Individual D and Individual E. Individual D and Individual E are both Wisconsin residents. For its 2011 taxable year, Partnership C computes $450,000 of ordinary business income for federal income tax purposes and a job creation deduction of $40,000. Partnership C reports the following amounts to both Individual D and Individual E:
(6) Professional employer organizations. The provisions of s. 202.24 (4) (b), Stats., apply to this section and ss. 71.05 (6) (b) 47m., 71.26 (1) (h), and 71.45 (1) (c), Stats.
Example: Company F, a professional employer organization, hires Employee G to perform services in Wisconsin for Taxpayer H, a client of Company F. For purposes of determining the job creation deduction, Employee G is considered to be an employee solely of Taxpayer H.
History: EmR1105: emerg. cr. eff. 4-7-11; CR 11-024: cr. Register November 2011 No. 671, eff. 12-1-11; CR 14-005: am. (6) Register August 2014 No. 704, eff. 9-1-14; CR 17-019: am. (3), Register June 2018 No. 750 eff. 7-1-18; correction in (2) (f) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register December 2024 No. 828.