Wis. Admin. Code § Ins 2.80
(1) Purpose.
(2) Scope. This section applies to all life insurance policies, wherever sold, with or without nonforfeiture values, issued on or after January 1, 2000, subject to the following exceptions and conditions:
(b) This section does not apply to any of the following:
1. Any universal life policy that meets all the following requirements:
(3) Definitions. In this section:
(b) “Contract segmentation method” means the method of dividing the period from issue to mandatory expiration of a policy into successive segments, with the length of each segment being defined as the period from the end of the prior segment, or from policy inception for the first segment, to the end of the latest policy year as determined below. All calculations are made using the 1980 CSO valuation table and, if elected, the optional minimum mortality standard for deficiency reserves in sub. (4) (b). The length of a particular contract segment shall be set equal to the minimum of the value t for which Gt is greater than Rt. If Gt never exceeds Rt the segment length is deemed to be the number of years from the beginning of the segment to the mandatory expiration date of the policy. Gt and Rt are defined as follows:
where:
x = original issue age;
k = the number of years from the date of issue to the beginning of the segment;
t = the number of years from the beginning of the segment
= 1, 2, ...; t is reset to 1 at the beginning of each segment;
GPx+k+t-1 = Guaranteed gross premium per thousand of face amount, ignoring policy fees only if level for the premium paying period of the policy, for year t of the segment.
However, if GPx+k+t is greater than 0 and GPx+k+t-1 is equal to 0, Gt shall be deemed to be 1000. If GPx+k+t and GPx+k+t-1 are both equal to 0, Gt shall be deemed to be 0.
however, Rt may be increased or decreased by one percent in any policy year, at the insurer’s option, but Rt may not be less than one;
where:
x, k and t are as defined above, and
qx+k+t-1 = valuation mortality rate for deficiency reserves in policy year k+t but using the mortality of sub. (4) (b) 2. if sub. (4) (b) 3. is elected for deficiency reserves.
Note: The purpose of the one percent tolerance in the R factor is to prevent irrational segment lengths due to such things as premium rounding. For example, consider a plan in which gross premiums are designed at some point to be a ratio times the underlying ultimate mortality rates, where the ratio varies by issue age. The resulting segments may be greater than one year, because the gross premiums are not expressed in fractional cents. The tolerance factor allows the creation of one-year segments for a plan in which premiums parallel the underlying valuation mortality table.
(f) “1980 CSO valuation table” means the commissioner’s’ 1980 standard ordinary mortality table without 10-year select mortality factors, incorporated into the 1980 amendments to the national association of insurance commissioner’s standard valuation law, as provided in s. 623.06 (2) (am), Stats., and variations of the 1980 CSO valuation table approved by the national association of insurance commissioners, such as the unisex and smoker and non-smoker versions approved in December 1983 and adopted by ss. Ins 2.20 and 2.35.
Note: This paragraph defines the 1980 CSO valuation table without the existing 10 year select mortality factors to assure that, if select mortality factors are elected, only one set of factors may be applied to the base valuation mortality table.
(h) “Segmented reserves” means reserves, calculated using segments produced by the contract segmentation method, equal to the present value of all future guaranteed benefits less the present value of all future net premiums to the mandatory expiration of a policy, where the net premiums within each segment are a uniform percentage of the respective guaranteed gross premiums within the segment. The uniform percentage for each segment is such that, at the beginning of the segment, the present value of the net premiums within the segment is calculated in the following manner:
4. For the first segment only, the excess of subd. 4. a. over subd. 4. b., as follows:
7. For both basic reserves and deficiency reserves computed by the contract segmentation method, present values shall include future benefits and net premiums in the current segment and in all subsequent segments.
Note: The segmentation requirement should not be limited to plans with no cash surrender values; otherwise companies could avoid segmentation entirely by designing policies with minimal (positive) cash values. Segmentation for plans with cash surrender values should be based solely upon gross premium levels. Basing segmentation upon the level of cash surrender values introduces complications because of the interrelationship between minimum cash surrender values and gross premium patterns. The requirements of this section relating to reserves or plans with unusual cash values and to reserves if cash values exceed calculated reserves serve to link required reserves and cash surrender values. The calculation of segmented reserves shall not be linked to the occurrence of a positive unitary terminal reserve at the end of a segment. The requirement of this section to hold the greater of the segmented reserve or the unitary reserve eliminates the need for any linkage.
(k) “Unitary reserves” means the present value of all future guaranteed benefits less the present value of all future modified net premiums, where all of the following occur:
2. Modified net premiums are a uniform percentage of the respective guaranteed gross premiums, where the uniform percentage is such that, at issue, the present value of the net premiums equals the present value of all death benefits and pure endowments, plus the excess of:
3. The interest rates used in the present value calculations for any policy may not exceed the maximum valuation interest rate, determined with a guarantee duration equal to the length from issue to the mandatory expiration of the policy.
Note: The purpose of this paragraph is to define as specifically as possible what has become commonly called the unitary method. The national association of insurance commissioners standard valuation law does not define the term “unitary” for policies with nonlevel premiums or benefits; its requirements for reserves “computed by a method that is consistent with the principles of the national association of insurance commissioners standard valuation law” has not been uniformly interpreted.
(4) General calculation requirements for basic reserves and premium deficiency reserves.
(a) At the election of the insurer for any one or more specified plans of life insurance, the minimum mortality standard for basic reserves may be calculated using the 1980 CSO valuation table with select mortality factors. If select mortality factors are elected, they may be any of the following:
2. The select mortality factors in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in april 1999.
Note: The select mortality factors for durations 1 through 15 in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in april 1999 reflect the society of actuaries’ data for the years 1983 through 1986 (designated as “83-86 SOA inter-company experience” in the tables), split by sex and smoking status, with fifteen years of select mortality improvement, based on the society of actuaries’ projection scale A applied. A 50% margin was added. The factors were then graded to the 1980 CSO valuation table over the next five durations. A 50% margin was deemed appropriate to provide a reasonable margin, with little likelihood that actual experience for significant blocks of business would exceed it.
(b) Deficiency reserves, if any, are calculated for each policy as the excess, if greater than zero, of the quantity A over the basic reserve. The quantity A is obtained by recalculating the basic reserve for the policy using guaranteed gross premiums instead of net premiums when the guaranteed gross premiums are less than the corresponding net premiums. At the election of the insurer for any one or more specified plans of insurance, the quantity A and the corresponding net premiums used in the determination of quantity A may be based upon the 1980 CSO valuation table with select mortality factors. If select mortality factors are elected, they may be any of the following:
2. The select mortality factors in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in april 1999.
Note: The select mortality factors in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999 do not reflect the underwriting risk classes that have evolved since the period of the underlying experience. In light of this consideration, and the recent recognition of the regulatory value of actuarial opinions, this section allows actuarial judgement to be used for deficiency reserves.
3. For durations in the first segment, X % of the select mortality factors in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999, subject to all of the following:
(c) This paragraph applies to both basic reserves and deficiency reserves. Any set of select mortality factors may be used only for the first segment. However, if the first segment is less than 10 years, the appropriate 10-year select mortality factors incorporated into the 1980 amendments to the national association of insurance commissioners standard valuation law, as provided in s. 623.06 (2) (am), Stats., may be used thereafter through the 10th policy year from the date of issue.
Note: This section does not allow the use of the select mortality factors beyond the first segment. The rationale is that the result of a premium increase that is sufficient to require a new segment will be increased lapsation, leading to mortality deterioration after the increase. However, this section allows the use of the ten-year select mortality factors incorporated into the 1980 amendments to the national association of insurance commissioners standard valuation law, see s. 623.06 (2) (am), Stats., beyond the first segment (but in no case beyond the tenth policy year) in recognition that the mortality deterioration is unlikely to occur to a significant degree within the first 10 years.
(e) Reserves for policies that have changes to guaranteed gross premiums, guaranteed benefits, guaranteed charges, or guaranteed credits that are unilaterally made by the insurer after issue and that are effective for more than one year after the date of the change shall be the greatest of the following:
(5) Calculation of minimum valuation standard for policies with guaranteed nonlevel gross premiums or guaranteed nonlevel benefits, other than universal life policies.
(a) Basic reserves shall be calculated as the greater of the segmented reserves and the unitary reserves. Both the segmented reserves and the unitary reserves for any policy shall use the same 1980 CSO valuation table and the same select mortality factors. At the option of the insurer, in calculating segmented reserves and net premiums, either of the following adjustments may be made:
(b) The deficiency reserve at any duration shall be calculated as follows:
(g) For any policy with an unusual pattern of guaranteed cash surrender values, the reserves actually held prior to the first unusual guaranteed cash surrender value may not be less than the reserves calculated by treating the first unusual guaranteed cash surrender value as a pure endowment and treating the policy as an n-year policy providing term insurance plus a pure endowment equal to the unusual cash surrender value, where n is the number of years from the date of issue to the date the unusual cash surrender value is scheduled.
Note: This requirement is independent of both the segmentation process and the unitary process. After the greater of the segmented or the unitary reserve has been determined, then pars. (g), (h), and (i) impose an additional floor of the ultimate reserve. The purpose of pars. (g), (h) and (i) is to assure adequate funding of significant increases in guaranteed cash surrender values.
(h) The reserves actually held subsequent to any unusual guaranteed cash surrender value may not be less than the reserves calculated by treating the policy as an n-year policy providing term insurance plus a pure endowment equal to the next unusual guaranteed cash surrender value, and treating any unusual guaranteed cash surrender value at the end of the prior segment as a net single premium, where all of the following apply:
(i) For purposes of pars. (g) and (h), a policy is considered to have an unusual pattern of guaranteed cash surrender values if any future guaranteed cash surrender value exceeds the prior year’s guaranteed cash surrender value by more than the sum of all of the following:
(j) At the option of the insurer, the following approach for reserves on yearly renewable term reinsurance may be used:
6. If the assuming company chooses this optional exemption, The ceding company’s reserve credit shall be limited to the amount of reserve held by the assuming company for the affected policies.
Note: Traditional reserves for yearly renewable term reinsurance, the calculations of which par. (j) describes, are already adequate and sufficient. However, without this option, yearly renewable term reinsurance would be subject to the more complex segmentation calculations.
(k) At the option of the insurer, the following approach for reserves for attained-age-based yearly renewable term life insurance policies may be used:
5. A policy shall be considered an attained-age-based yearly renewable term life insurance policy for purposes of this paragraph if both of the following apply:
6. For policies that become attained-age-based yearly renewable term policies after an initial period of coverage, the approach of this paragraph may be used after the initial period if both the following apply:
7. If the election in this paragraph is made, this approach shall be applied in determining reserves for all attained-age-based yearly renewable term life insurance policies issued on or after the effective date of this section.
Note: Traditional reserves for attained-age-based yearly renewable term policies, the calculations of which this paragraph describes, are already adequate and sufficient. However, without this option, these policies would be subject to the more complex segmentation calculations.
(L) Unitary basic reserves and unitary deficiency reserves need not be calculated for a policy if all of the following conditions are met:
3. There is no cash surrender value in any policy year.
Note: Without this exemption, companies issuing certain n-year renewable term policies could be forced to hold reserves higher than n-year term reserves, even though in many cases gross premiums are well above valuation mortality rates.
(m) Unitary basic reserves and unitary deficiency reserves need not be calculated for a juvenile policy if, based upon the initial current premium scale at issue, all of the following conditions are met:
3. After the end of the juvenile period, gross premiums are level for the remainder of the premium-paying period, and death benefits are level for the remainder of the life of the policy.
Note: The jumping juvenile policy described has traditionally been valued in two segments. This exemption will allow that practice to continue without requiring the calculation of reserves on a unitary basis. However, within each segment, both basic and deficiency reserves shall comply with the segmented reserve requirements.
(6) Calculation of minimum valuation standard for flexible premium and fixed premium universal life insurance policies that contain provisions resulting in the ability of a policyowner to keep a policy in force over a secondary guarantee period.
(a) Policies with a secondary guarantee include any of the following:
(i) The minimum reserves during the secondary guarantee period are the greater of the following:
2. The minimum reserves required by other rules governing universal life plans.
Note: The tables at pages 21 through 43 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999 contains tables of select mortality factors that are the bases to which the respective percentage of sub. (4) (a) 2., (b) 2., and 3. are applied. The 6 tables of select mortality factors include: (1) male aggregate, (2) male nonsmoker, (3) male smoker, (4) female aggregate, (5) female nonsmoker, and (6) female smoker. These tables apply to both age last birthday and age nearest birthday mortality tables.
For sex-blended mortality tables, compute select mortality factors in the same proportion as the underlying mortality. For example, for the 1980 CSO-B Table, the calculated select mortality factors are 80% of the appropriate male table in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999, plus 20% of the appropriate female table in the tables at pages 18 through 35 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999.
Section Ins 2.20 allows the use of sex-blended mortality table for the purposes of determining nonforfeiture values, but sex-blended tables are not allowed for the purposes of valuing minimum reserve liabilities under s. Ins 2.80 or s. 623.06, Stats.
Note: Copies of the tables at pages 21 through 43 of the national association of insurance commissioners valuation of life insurance policies model regulation updated and published by the national association of insurance commissioners model regulation service in April 1999 for use with s. Ins 2.80, Wis. Adm. Code, are available from the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, P.O. Box 1768, Madison WI 53707-7873 or from the OCI website: http://oci.wi.gov, at information for companies, OCI rule-making information.
History: Cr. Register, March, 1998, No. 507, eff. 1-1-99; r. and recr. Register, June, 1999, No. 522, eff. 7-1-99; CR 04-071: cr. (2) (e), am. (4) (b) 3. (intro.), r. Appendix I, Register December 2004 No. 588, eff. 1-1-05; CR 14-008: r. (4) (b) 3. b., c., am. (4) (b) 3. g., i. Register August 2014 No. 704, eff. 9-1-14.