Wash. Admin. Code § 434-270-030
Two approved methods for allocating costs directly related to a specific primary or election are detailed in this section. The county auditor, once having adopted a method, shall use the same parameters for all primaries and elections within the next election cycle.
Allocate costs between all jurisdictions participating in the primary or election by using one of the two following prescribed methods.
Costs associated with mistakes or errors made or caused by the county auditor shall not be passed on to any other jurisdiction.
(1) Method one. This method allocates costs based on the number of active registered voters in each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions are not charged for additional offices or measures placed on the ballot. To ensure that sufficient election cost reimbursement funds are available, county auditors must get prior approval from the office of the secretary of state prior to using method one.
(b) The county auditor shall allocate a minimum fee of at least $100 once to each jurisdiction participating in a primary or election. This allows for a more equitable distribution of costs in that election.
To allocate costs:
(2) Method two. This method allows for recovery of additional expenditures associated with multiple offices or measures on the ballot for each jurisdiction. Use of this method requires using a factor of 0.2 that is applied to each additional office or measure within a jurisdiction or jurisdiction subdistrict portion.
(b) The county auditor shall collect a minimum fee of at least $100 once from each jurisdiction participating in a primary or an election. This allows for a more equitable distribution of costs in that primary or election.
(d) Determine the factor for the number of offices and measures for each jurisdiction and jurisdiction subdistrict portion. A base factor of 1.0 will be assigned for the first office or measure for the jurisdiction. For each additional office or measure within the jurisdiction or subdistrict of the jurisdiction, the 0.2 factor will be added. For jurisdiction subdistrict portions, all offices or measures will be assigned to the 0.2 factor.
Example: Within the county, the state has five statewide offices and measures and two legislative districts, both with two offices on the ballot. The first statewide office or measure would use the 1.0 factor, the four additional statewide offices and measures would use the 0.2 factor, and the legislative jurisdictions would each use the 0.2 factor based on each legislative district's number of active registered voters.
Using the 0.2 factor for the statewide offices and measures the state would be charged a factor of 1.0 for the first statewide office or measure and 0.2 for each of the four additional statewide offices or measures (1.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2) for a total of 1.8 for the statewide jurisdictions. For the individual legislative districts, each district would have two offices, each with a factor of 0.2 (0.2 + 0.2) for a total of 0.4 for each legislative district.
The total number of active registered voters in a jurisdiction and the number of voters who vote on an office or measure are separate and distinct from each other. The county auditor must separate offices or measures that contain a portion of the voters less than the total number of eligible registered voters in that jurisdiction. The calculation of costs for a jurisdiction must sum the independently calculated costs for each unique combination of registered voters and offices or measures on the ballot.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 29A.04.611. WSR 26-07-033, s 434-270-030, filed 3/11/26, effective 4/11/26.]