Wash. Admin. Code § 173-303-100
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to describe methods for determining if a solid waste is a dangerous waste by the criteria set forth in this section. The dangerous waste criteria consist of:
(2) References. The following toxicity data sources are adopted by reference:
(3) A person must use data that are available to him or her, and, when such data are inadequate for the purposes of this section, must refer to the references identified in WAC 173-303-100(2) to determine:
(4) Quantity exclusion limit. A solid waste is a dangerous waste if it meets one or more of the dangerous waste criteria described in subsections (5) and (6) of this section. If a person's solid waste meets one or more of these criteria then he or she is a dangerous waste generator (and may not be considered a small quantity generator as provided in WAC 173-303-170(2)) if the quantity of the waste exceeds the following quantity exclusion limits:
(5) Toxicity criteria. Except as provided in WAC 173-303-070 (4) or (5), a person must determine if a solid waste meets the toxicity criteria under this section by following either the instructions for book designation, when his knowledge of the waste is sufficient, or by testing the waste using the biological testing methods adopted under WAC 173-303-110(3).
(b) Book designation procedure. A person may determine if a waste meets the toxicity criteria by following the book designation instructions as follows:
(i) A person must determine the toxic category for each known constituent. The toxic category for each constituent may be determined from available data, for example, Registry for Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB), and Ecotoxicology database (ECOTOX). The toxic category should then be identified, using the table below. If data are available for more than one test endpoint (that is, fish, oral rat, inhalation rat, or dermal rabbit), the value with the highest toxicity must be used. Similarly, if toxicity data do not agree on the same toxic category within the same test endpoint, the value with the highest toxicity must be used.a Finally, if toxicity data for a constituent cannot be found in reasonably available sources (for example, RTECS, HSDB or ECOTOX), the toxic category for that constituent need not be determined.
TOXIC CATEGORY TABLE
| ToxicCategory | FishLC50(mg/L)b | Oral RatLD50(mg/kg) | InhalationRatLC50(mg/L)c | DermalRabbitLD50(mg/kg) | ||||
| X | <0.01 | <0.5 | <0.02 | <2 | ||||
| A | 0.01 - <0.1 | 0.5 - <5 | 0.02 - <0.2 | 2 - <20 | ||||
| B | 0.1 - <1 | 5 - <50 | 0.2 - <2 | 20 - <200 | ||||
| C | 1 - <10 | 50 - <500 | 2 - <20 | 200 - <2000 | ||||
| D | 10 - 100 | 500 - 5000 | 20 - 200 | 2000 - 20,000 | ||||
| a | These four test endpoints are defined in WAC 173-303-040. | |||||||
| b | Fish LC50 data must be derived from an exposure period greater than or equal to twenty-four hours. A hierarchy of species LC50 data should be used that includes (in decreasing order of preference) salmonids, fathead minnows, and other fish species. | |||||||
| c | Inhalation Rat LC50 data must be derived from an exposure period greater than or equal to one hour. |
(ii) A person whose waste contains one or more toxic constituents must determine the equivalent concentration for the waste from the following formula:
| Equivalent | ∑X% | + | ∑A% | + | ∑B% | + | ∑C% | + | ∑D% |
| Concentration (%) = | 1 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
where ∑(X,A,B,C, or D)% is the sum of all the concentration percentages for a particular toxic category.
Example 1. A person's waste contains: Aldrin (A Category) - .01%; Endrin (A Category) - 1%; Benzene (D Category) - 4%; Phenol (C Category) - 2%; Dinoseb (B Category) - 5%; Water (nontoxic) - 87%. The equivalent concentration (E.C.) would be:
| E.C. (%) | = | 0% | + | (0.01%+ 1.0%) | + | 5.0% | + | 2.0% | + | 4.0% |
| 1 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 | ||||||
| = | 0% + 0.101% + 0.05% + 0.002% + 0.0004% = 0.1534% |
So the equivalent concentration equals 0.1534%.
(iii) A person whose waste contains toxic constituents must determine its designation according to the value of the equivalent concentration:
(D) If the equivalent concentration is equal to or greater than 1.0%, the person will designate the waste as EHW and assign the dangerous waste number WT01.
Example 1. Continued. The equivalent concentration of 0.1534% (from Example 1. above) is greater than 0.001% and less than 1.0%. The waste is DW and the dangerous waste number WT02 must be assigned.
(c) Designation from bioassay data. A person may determine if a waste meets the toxicity criteria by following the bioassay designation instructions of either:
(6) Persistence criteria. For the purposes of this section, persistent constituents are chemical compounds which are either halogenated organic compounds (HOC), or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), as defined under WAC 173-303-040. Except as provided in WAC 173-303-070 (4) or (5), a person may determine the identity and concentration of persistent constituents by either applying knowledge of the waste or by testing the waste according to WAC 173-303-110 (3)(c) Chemical Testing Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste Publication #97-407.
(b) When a waste contains one or more halogenated organic compounds (HOC) for which the concentrations are known, the total halogenated organic compound concentration must be determined by summing the concentration percentages for all of the halogenated organic compounds for which the concentration is known.
Example 2. A waste contains: Carbon tetrachloride - .009%; DDT - .012%; 1,1,1 - trichloroethylene - .020%. The total halogenated organic compound concentration would be:
Total HOC Concentration (%) = .009% + .012% +.020% =.041%
(c) A person whose waste contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) as defined in WAC 173-303-040, must determine the total PAH concentration by summing the concentration percentages of each of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for which they know the concentration.
Example 3. A person's waste contains: Chrysene - .08%; 3,4 - benzo(a)pyrene - 1.22%. The total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration would be:
Total PAH Concentration (%) = .08% + 1.22% = 1.30%
(d) A person whose waste contains halogenated organic compounds and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons must determine its designation from the persistent dangerous waste table.
PERSISTENT DANGEROUS WASTE TABLE
| If your wastecontains... | At a totalconcentrationlevel of... | Then your waste'sdesignation, andwaste # are... |
| HalogenatedOrganic Compounds (HOC) | 0.01% to 1.0%greater than 1.0% | DW, WP02EHW, WP01 |
| Polycyclic AromaticHydrocarbons (PAH) | greater than 1.0% | EHW*, WP03 |
| *No DW concentration level for PAH. |
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105, 70.105D RCW and Subtitle C of RCRA. WSR 20-20-045 (Order 19-07), § 173-303-100, filed 9/30/20, effective 10/31/20. Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105 RCW. WSR 15-01-123 (Order 13-07), § 173-303-100, filed 12/18/14, effective 1/18/15. Statutory Authority: Chapters 70.105 and 70.105D RCW. WSR 09-14-105 (Order 07-12), § 173-303-100, filed 6/30/09, effective 7/31/09. Statutory Authority: Chapters 70.105, 70.105D, and 15.54 RCW and RCW 70.105.007. WSR 04-24-065 (Order 03-10), § 173-303-100, filed 11/30/04, effective 1/1/05. Statutory Authority: Chapters 70.105 and 70.105D RCW. WSR 03-07-049 (Order 02-03), § 173-303-100, filed 3/13/03, effective 4/13/03. Statutory Authority: Chapters 70.105, 70.105D, 15.54 RCW and RCW 70.105.007. WSR 00-11-040 (Order 99-01), § 173-303-100, filed 5/10/00, effective 6/10/00. Statutory Authority: Chapters 70.105 and 70.105D RCW. WSR 98-03-018 (Order 97-03), § 173-303-100, filed 1/12/98, effective 2/12/98; WSR 95-22-008 (Order 94-30), § 173-303-100, filed 10/19/95, effective 11/19/95; WSR 94-01-060 (Order 92-33), § 173-303-100, filed 12/8/93, effective 1/8/94. Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105 RCW. WSR 84-09-088 (Order DE 83-36), § 173-303-100, filed 4/18/84. Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105 RCW and RCW 70.95.260. WSR 82-05-023 (Order DE 81-33), § 173-303-100, filed 2/10/82.]