(1) The division shall establish and publish maximum allowable fees for both basic services and complexities for architect and design professional services based on:
- (a) project size and complexity;
- (b) regional market conditions;
- (c) industry standards for educational facilities; and
- (d) historical cost data from comparable projects.
(2) An LEA shall:
- (a) ensure that no contract for architect or design professional services exceeds the maximum fees established by the division under Subsection (1);
- (b) submit all proposed contracts to the division for verification of compliance with maximum fee limits before execution; and
- (c) demonstrate through competitive procurement that proposed fees represent fair market value within the established maximums.
(3) If an LEA believes a project requires fees exceeding the division's maximum allowable fees, the LEA shall:
- (a) submit a detailed written request to the division before soliciting proposals;
- (b) provide documentation of unique project circumstances requiring specialized expertise;
- (c) demonstrate that the project cannot be completed within the fee schedule; and
- (d) obtain written approval from the division before proceeding.
(4) The division shall:
- (a) review cost submissions within 15 business days;
- (b) provide written explanation for any required modifications; and
- (c) update cost benchmarks annually based on market conditions.
(5) The division shall develop and maintain a library of standardized school design templates developed in collaboration with architects experienced in the design of school facilities that:
- (a) provide pre-approved design options for common school types and sizes;
- (b) reduce architectural costs through standardized specifications;
- (c) accelerate the approval process for school districts using standard designs;
- (d) allow modifications for site-specific requirements; and
- (e) are updated every five years to reflect current educational needs.
(6) The division shall develop and maintain a library of standardized school design templates developed in collaboration with architects experienced in the design of school facilities that:
- (a) provide pre-approved design options for common school types and sizes;
(b) reduce architectural costs through:
- (i) reduced design scope for projects using prototype designs;
- (ii) standardized specifications and details;
- (iii) elimination of redundant design work; and
- (iv) lower fee schedule tiers for prototype-based projects;
(c) accelerate the approval process through:
- (i) pre-approved building systems and layouts;
- (ii) reduced plan review time for projects adhering to prototype designs; and
- (iii) streamlined permitting when no significant prototype modifications are made;
- (d) allow modifications for site-specific requirements; and
- (e) are updated every five years to reflect current educational needs and building standards.
(7) An LEA using a standardized design prototype:
- (a) shall comply with all procurement requirements under Title 63G, Chapter 6a, Utah Procurement Code;
- (b) may receive reduced architect fees reflecting the limited scope of site adaptation work;
- (c) may receive an expedited plan review within 10 business days if no significant modifications are made;
- (d) is encouraged to use design-build delivery methods with prototype designs to maximize cost savings; and
- (e) shall coordinate with the division on any proposed modifications to ensure continued compliance with prototype standards.
(8) An LEA shall procure architect and design professional services:
- (a) in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 6a, Part 15, Design Professional Services;
- (b) using qualifications-based selection procedures as required by Subsection 63G-6a-1502(1);
- (c) based on demonstrated competence and qualification for the type of services required; and
- (d) not based solely on price.
- (9) An LEA may appeal the division's maximum fee determinations or denials of requests for fee exceptions to the appeals panel established under Section 63A-5b-1221.
Enacted by Chapter 225, 2026 General Session