1. (1) Each institution shall conduct a student disciplinary proceeding or student organization disciplinary proceeding in an impartial manner free from conflicts of interests.
2. (2) An individual may not serve as an investigator or institutional prosecutor and an advocate for an accused student, accused student organization, or victim in the same matter.

3. (3) Except as provided in Section R765-256-7, each institution shall prohibit an individual employed by or otherwise representing an institution from acting as an adjudicator, hearing officer, or appellate hearing officer in a student disciplinary proceeding or student organization disciplinary proceeding if the individual has also served in one of the following roles in the same matter:

   1. (a) an advocate or counselor for an alleged victim, accused student, or accused student organization;
   2. (b) an investigator;
   3. (c) an institutional prosecutor; or
   4. (d) an advisor to a person described in Subsection 765-256-7(3)(a), (3)(b), or (3)(c).
4. (4) Each institution may not prohibit an accused student or victim from having an advisor and being represented, at the student's expense, by legal representation or a non-attorney advocate at a student disciplinary proceeding that pertains to the accused student or victim.
5. (5) If an individual employed by the institution or otherwise representing the institution serves as an investigator and an institutional prosecutor for the alleged violation of a policy or rule, the institution shall advise an accused student, accused student organization, or victim before proceeding with the investigation.
6. (6) Each institution shall allow the accused student, accused student organization, or victim to raise objections to issues that could potentially compromise the impartiality of the proceeding, including any potential conflicts of interest in violation of this rule.

KEY: education, student discipline

Date of Last Change: June 9, 2026

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 53H-7-302