- 1. the statute, rule, or policy with which the division action is alleged to be inconsistent;
- 2. the nature of the inconsistency of the division action with the statute, rule, or policy;
- 3. the action the petitioner feels would be consistent under the circumstances with statute, rule, or policy; and
- 4. the injury realized by the party that is specific to the party arising from division action. If the injury identified by the petition is not peculiar to the petitioner as a result of the division action, the director will decline to undertake consistency review.
The petition shall state:
KEY: right of petition, administrative procedure
Date of Last Change: January 25, 2026
Notice of Continuation: January 8, 2026
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 65A-1-4(2)