1. (1) The chair shall rule on any motions or objections raised during a committee meeting, set reasonable limits on the statements or documents presented, including any statements from the complainant. The chair may limit the time allowed for the presentation of information, may bifurcate any issues to be considered, and may make any other rulings regarding any committee proceeding or committee meeting.
2. (2) A committee meeting may not be held unless at least three members of the committee present.
3. (3) The respondent ALJ may present information to, make statements, and produce witnesses for the committee's consideration.
4. (4) Committee members may ask questions of any witness including the respondent ALJ.
5. (5) Immediately following the conclusion of the committee meeting, the committee shall deliberate and decide whether there is sufficient evidence the respondent ALJ violated the code of conduct or otherwise engaged in misconduct. Any such decision shall require a majority vote of the participating committee members.
6. (6) The committee shall use the preponderance of the evidence standard when making decisions.
7. (7) Within 30 days of the conclusion of the committee meeting, the chair shall prepare a memorandum decision or report, with a recommendation for any proposed personnel action, and shall forward the decision and recommendation to the respondent ALJ and the agency head of the respondent ALJ.
8. (8) After deliberation, if the committee finds insufficient evidence or reason to determine misconduct occurred, the complaint shall be dismissed.

KEY: administrative law judges, conduct committee

Date of Last Change: July 1, 2022

Notice of Continuation: March 9, 2022

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63A-17-701 through 63A-17-710