1. (1) After the date established for the first submittal of information, a register of submitting architects and engineers shall be prepared and open to public inspection. Before award, submittals and modifications shall be shown only to procurement officials and other persons involved with the review and selection process who shall adhere to the requirements of GRAMA and this rule.
2. (2) The Executive Director shall, throughout the course of, and at the end of the contract, evaluate the performance of the architectural or engineering firm; verbally and in writing. There shall be at least one verbal review of the architectural or engineering firm's performance on each project, before the project's completion. The Executive Director shall also advise the architectural or engineering firm, in writing, about their performance at the end of the project. If the firm wishes to respond to those evaluations, it may enter its responses in the file.
3. (3) Except as provided in this rule, submittals shall be open to public inspection after notice of the selection results.
4. (4) The classification of records as protected, and the treatment of such records shall be as provided in Section R131-4-411A.
5. (5) The Board finds that it is necessary to maintain the confidentiality of performance evaluations and reference information to avoid competitive injury and to encourage those persons providing the information to respond in an open and honest manner without fear of retribution. Accordingly, records containing performance evaluations and reference information are classified as protected records under Subsection 63G-2-305(6) and shall be disclosed only to those persons involved with the performance evaluation, the architect-engineer that the information addresses and persons involved with the review and selection of submittals. The Board or Executive Director may, however, provide reference information to other governmental entities for use in their procurement activities and to other parties when requested by the architect-engineer that is the subject of the information. Any other disclosure of such performance evaluations and reference information shall only be as required by applicable law.
6. (6) Notice. After the selection of the successful firm, notice of the selection shall be available in the principal office of the Executive Director in Salt Lake City, Utah and may be available on the internet.

7. (7) Information Disclosed. The following shall be disclosed with the notice of selection:

   1. (a) the ranking of the firms;
   2. (b) the names of the selection committee members;
   3. (c) the final scores used by the selection committee to make the selection, except that the names of the individual scorers may not be associated with their individual scores; and
   4. (d) the written justification statement supporting the selection.

8. (8) Information Classified as Protected. After due consideration, the following has been determined by the

   1. (a) the names of individual selection committee scorers in relation to their individual scores or rankings; and
   2. (b) non-public financial statements.

   Board to impair governmental procurement proceedings or give an unfair advantage to any person proposing to enter into a contract with the Board or Executive Director and shall be classified as protected records:

KEY: architects, capitol-preservation, engineers, procurement

Date of Last Change: November 4, 2024

Notice of Continuation: September 30, 2024

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63O-2-301(2); 63O-2-301(3)