6 USCIS-PM J.4
USCIS has sole jurisdiction over petitions for special immigrant juvenile (SIJ) classification.[1] Provided the petitioner is otherwise eligible, classification as an SIJ establishes eligibility to apply for adjustment of status.[2]
In general, USCIS issues a decision on a properly filed petition for SIJ classification within 180 days.[3] The 180-day timeframe begins on the Notice of Action (Form I-797) receipt date.[4]
The 180-day timeframe applies only to the initial adjudication of the SIJ petition. The requirement does not extend to the adjudication of any motion or appeal filed after a denial of an SIJ petition.
USCIS has discretion to interview SIJ petitioners for the purposes of adjudicating the SIJ petition.[5] USCIS recognizes the vulnerable nature of SIJ petitioners and generally conducts interviews of SIJ petitioners only when an interview is deemed necessary. USCIS conducts a full review of the petition and supporting evidence to determine whether an interview may be warranted. USCIS generally does not require an interview if the record contains sufficient information and evidence to approve the petition without an in-person assessment. However, USCIS retains the discretion to interview SIJ petitioners for the purposes of adjudicating the SIJ petition, as appropriate.
Given the vulnerable nature of SIJ petitioners and the hardships they may face because of the loss of parental support, USCIS strives to establish a child-friendly interview environment if an interview is scheduled. During an interview, officers avoid questioning the petitioner about the details of the abuse, neglect, or abandonment suffered, because these issues are handled by the juvenile court. Officers generally focus the interview on resolving issues related to the eligibility requirements, including age.
The petitioner may bring a trusted adult to the interview in addition to an attorney or representative.[6] The trusted adult may serve as a familiar source of comfort to the petitioner, but should not interfere with the interview process or coach the petitioner during the interview. Given potential human trafficking and other concerns, officers assess the appropriateness of the adult’s attendance in the interview and observe the adult’s interaction with the child. When appropriate, the officer may interview the child without that adult present. Although USCIS may limit the number of persons present at the interview, such limitations do not extend to the petitioner’s attorney or accredited representative of record.[7]
Additional evidence may be requested at the discretion of the officer if needed to determine eligibility.[8] To provide petitioners an opportunity to address concerns before issuing a denial, officers generally issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), where the evidence is insufficient to adjudicate the petition.[9] The officer may request additional evidence for reasons such as, but not limited to:
There may be cases where the officer suspects or determines that a petitioner has committed fraud in attempting to establish eligibility for SIJ classification. In these cases, officers follow current procedures when referring a case to Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS).[10]
SIJ classification may not be granted absent the consent of the Secretary of Homeland Security. DHS delegates this authority to USCIS. Therefore, USCIS approval of the SIJ petition is evidence of DHS consent. USCIS notifies petitioners in writing upon approval of the petition.[11]
If the petitioner does not provide necessary evidence or does not meet the eligibility requirements, USCIS denies the Form I-360 petition. If USCIS denies the SIJ petition, USCIS provides the petitioner with a written denial notice which includes a detailed basis for the denial.[12] An SIJ petitioner may appeal an adverse decision or request that USCIS reopen or reconsider a USCIS decision.[13] The denial notice includes instructions for filing a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B).
Automatic Revocation
An approved SIJ petition is automatically revoked as of the date of approval if any one of the circumstances below occurs before USCIS issues a decision on the SIJ’s application for adjustment of status:[14]
USCIS issues a notice to the petitioner of such revocation of the SIJ petition.[16]
Revocation on Notice
In addition, USCIS, with notice, may revoke an approved petition for SIJ classification for good and sufficient cause such as fraud, or if USCIS determines the petition was approved in error.[17] In these instances, USCIS issues a Notice of Intent to Revoke (NOIR) and provides the petitioner an opportunity to offer evidence in support of the petition and in opposition to the grounds alleged for revocation of the approval.[18]
Under the SaraviaSettlement Agreement, USCIS does not revoke a petition for SIJ classification based in whole or in part on the fact that the state court’s best interest determination was not made with consideration of the petitioner’s gang affiliation.[19]
If USCIS previously granted deferred action to an alien with SIJ classification in the exercise of discretion, the alien’s deferred action remains valid for the authorized period, unless terminated by USCIS, on a case-by-case basis, as a matter of discretion. USCIS will not consider requests for renewal of deferred action for aliens with SIJ classification who remain ineligible to apply for adjustment of status because an immigrant visa number is not immediately available.
USCIS reserves the right to terminate prior grants of deferred action and revoke the related employment authorization as a matter of discretion. Examples may include, but are not limited to, cases where:
This termination and revocation may occur at any time, including prior to the end of the current validity period(s).
[^ 1] See Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant (Form I-360). See 8 CFR 204.11(h).
[^ 2] See Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485). Generally, an applicant may only apply to USCIS for adjustment of status if there is a visa number available for the special immigrant classification (EB-4), and the applicant is not in removal proceedings. If an SIJ is in removal proceedings, the immigration court must terminate the proceedings before USCIS can adjudicate the adjustment application. Conversely, the applicant may seek adjustment of status with the immigration court based on USCIS’ approval of the SIJ petition. For more information, see Volume 7, Adjustment of Status, Part A, Adjustment of Status Policies and Procedures [7 USCIS-PM A], Part B, 245(a) Adjustment [7 USCIS-PM B], and Part F, Special Immigrant-Based Adjustment, Chapter 7, Special Immigrant Juveniles [7 USCIS-PM F.7].
[^ 3] See Section 235(d)(2) of the Trafficking Victims Protection and Reauthorization Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-457 (PDF), 122 Stat. 5044, 5080 (December 23, 2008).
[^ 4] In Casa Libre/Freedom House v. Mayorkas,the courtissued a Declaratory Judgment that the tolling provisions in 8 CFR 204.11(g)(1) are not in accordance with the 180-day timeframe in 8 U.S.C. 1232(d)(2) to the extent that they allow adjudication beyond the 180-day timeframe. See Casa Libre/Freedom House v. Mayorkas, No: 2:22-cv-01510-ODW, 2023 WL 4872892 (C.D. Cal. July 31, 2023).
[^ 5] See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(9).
[^ 6] See 8 CFR 204.11(f).
[^ 7] See 8 CFR 204.11(f).
[^ 8] See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8).
[^ 9] For more information on timeframes and responses to Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny, see Volume 1, General Policies and Procedures, Part E, Adjudications, Chapter 6, Evidence, Section F, Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny [1 USCIS-PM E.6(F)].
[^ 10] A referral to FDNS does not change the 180-day timeframe for adjudication. However, the timeframe for processing will stop or be suspended for delays caused by the petitioner. See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(10). See 8 CFR 204.11(g)(1).
[^ 11] See 8 CFR 204.11(h).
[^ 12] See 8 CFR 204.11(h).
[^ 13] See 8 CFR 103.3. See 8 CFR 103.5. See 8 CFR 204.11(h).
[^ 14] See 8 CFR 204.11(j)(1).
[^ 15] Revocation does not occur, however, where the juvenile court places the petitioner with the parent who was not the subject of the nonviable reunification determination.
[^ 16] See 8 CFR 205.1(b).
[^ 17] See INA 205. See 8 CFR 204.11(j)(2). See 8 CFR 205.2.
[^ 18] See 8 CFR 205.2(b).
[^ 19] See Saravia v. Barr (PDF), 3:17-cv-03615 (N.D. Cal. January 14, 2021).