(a) On application of a party, the court shall vacate an award if:
- (1) the award was obtained by corruption, fraud, or other undue means;
(2) the rights of a party were prejudiced by:
- (A) evident partiality by an arbitrator appointed as a neutral arbitrator;
- (B) corruption in an arbitrator; or
- (C) misconduct or wilful misbehavior of an arbitrator;
(3) the arbitrators:
- (A) exceeded their powers;
- (B) refused to postpone the hearing after a showing of sufficient cause for the postponement;
- (C) refused to hear evidence material to the controversy; or
- (D) conducted the hearing, contrary to Section 171.043, 171.044, 171.045, 171.046, or 171.047, in a manner that substantially prejudiced the rights of a party; or
- (4) there was no agreement to arbitrate, the issue was not adversely determined in a proceeding under Subchapter B, and the party did not participate in the arbitration hearing without raising the objection.
- (b) A party must make an application under this section not later than the 90th day after the date of delivery of a copy of the award to the applicant. A party must make an application under Subsection (a)(1) not later than the 90th day after the date the grounds for the application are known or should have been known.
- (c) If the application to vacate is denied and a motion to modify or correct the award is not pending, the court shall confirm the award.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.