The projected end of fiscal year probation count for each county for fiscal year 2014 is calculated by increasing the fiscal year 2013 actual probation count by the factor as indicated in § 17:10:07:01. The projected end of fiscal year probation counts for each county for fiscal years 2015 to 2017, inclusive, are calculated by increasing the projected count from the previous fiscal year rounded to the nearest whole number by the projection factor. The table below contains projected end of fiscal year adult felony probation count used to determine payments under SDCL 1-15-36:

County

FY13

Actual

Probation

Counts

Projection

Factor

FY14

Projected

FY15

Projected

FY16

Projected

FY17

Projected

Aurora

4

0.00%

4

4

4

4

Beadle

97

9.26%

106

116

127

138

Bennett

19

10.00%

21

23

25

28

Bon Homme

10

10.00%

11

12

13

15

Brookings

144

9.85%

158

174

191

210

Brown

302

5.09%

317

334

351

368

Brule

33

8.77%

36

39

42

46

Buffalo

1

0.00%

1

1

1

1

Butte

76

10.00%

84

92

101

111

Campbell

3

10.00%

3

4

4

4

Charles Mix

74

10.00%

81

90

98

108

Clark

12

10.00%

13

15

16

18

Clay

90

10.00%

99

109

120

132

Codington

177

10.00%

195

214

236

259

Corson

4

10.00%

4

5

5

6

Custer

33

2.59%

34

35

36

37

Davison

168

8.93%

183

199

217

237

Day

15

10.00%

17

18

20

22

Deuel

8

10.00%

9

10

11

12

Dewey

8

10.00%

9

10

11

12

Douglas

5

10.00%

6

6

7

7

Edmunds

11

10.00%

12

13

15

16

Fall River

57

4.61%

60

62

65

68

Faulk

3

10.00%

3

4

4

4

Grant

10

10.00%

11

12

13

15

Gregory

8

10.00%

9

10

11

12

Haakon

7

8.33%

8

8

9

10

Hamlin

3

0.00%

3

3

3

3

Hand

2

0.00%

2

2

2

2

Hanson

0

0.00%

0

0

0

0

Harding

3

10.00%

3

4

4

4

Hughes

134

10.00%

147

162

178

196

Hutchinson

15

9.98%

16

18

20

22

Hyde

1

10.00%

1

1

1

1

Jackson

15

4.03%

16

16

17

18

Jerauld

7

10.00%

8

8

9

10

Jones

5

0.00%

5

5

5

5

Kingsbury

8

10.00%

9

10

11

12

Lake

40

0.00%

40

40

40

40

Lawrence

143

6.11%

152

161

171

181

Lincoln

74

10.00%

81

90

98

108

Lyman

19

1.39%

19

20

20

20

Marshall

6

10.00%

7

7

8

9

McCook

11

10.00%

12

13

15

16

McPherson

1

0.00%

1

1

1

1

Meade

189

10.00%

208

229

252

277

Mellette

9

0.00%

9

9

9

9

Miner

1

0.00%

1

1

1

1

Minnehaha

1284

10.00%

1412

1554

1709

1880

Moody

16

10.00%

18

19

21

23

Pennington

1006

10.00%

1107

1217

1339

1473

Perkins

23

10.00%

25

28

31

34

Potter

4

10.00%

4

5

5

6

Roberts

106

10.00%

117

128

141

155

Sanborn

2

0.00%

2

2

2

2

Oglala Lakota

2

0.00%

2

2

2

2

Spink

20

10.00%

22

24

27

29

Stanley

15

10.00%

17

18

20

22

Sully

6

10.00%

7

7

8

9

Todd

10

10.00%

11

12

13

15

Tripp

26

0.00%

26

26

26

26

Turner

24

3.92%

25

26

27

28

Union

107

8.81%

116

127

138

150

Walworth

59

0.00%

59

59

59

59

Yankton

233

10.00%

256

282

310

341

Ziebach

3

10.00%

3

4

4

4

Source: 41 SDR 53, effective October 6, 2014; SL 2015, ch 56, § 1, effective May 1, 2015.

General Authority: SDCL 1-15-36.

Law Implemented: SDCL 1-15-36

Prior versions effective: 2014-10-06.