S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 69-18
Section 1. Purposes. The within Regulation is predicated upon recognition of the fact that, as presently constituted, the title insurance business is characterized by reverse competition, which is to say that competition among title insurers regularly takes the form of insurers vying with each other for the favor of mortgage lenders, attorneys, or others who control, or who may control, the placement of the title insurance with title insurers. Such reverse competition tends to increase title insurance premiums or to prevent lowering of such premiums in order that greater commissions or other allowances may be paid to agents or mortgage lenders for such business as a means of obtaining the placement of business controlled by the agent with the insurer paying the highest commissions. In addition, other inducements are made to mortgage lenders, attorneys, or others who control, or who may control, such business by title insurers as a means of securing the placement of such business with the insurers offering the inducements. The reciprocal of such inducements is that mortgage lenders or others have resorted to practices which constitute or border upon coercion, intimidation, or boycott in order to obtain or increase their participation in the title insurance premiums. Manifestly, reverse competition works to the detriment, rather than in favor of, the consumer who is called upon to pay the title insurance premiums, and this reverse competition operates to thwart normal economic forces which would otherwise tend to lower title insurance premiums.
(b) Title insurers which abstain from the payment of excessive commissions or the offering of such inducements either because they deem the same to be morally wrong, or because they fear Federal prosecution, cannot operate or expand their operations within this State because of the competitive disadvantage which they suffer through refusing to offer such inducements.
Section 2. Unlawful Rebates and Inducements. No title insurer or other person controlled by it shall pay or offer to pay, either directly or indirectly, any referral commission or fee or any part of the premiums for title insurance or any other consideration whatsoever as an inducement for or as compensation on any title insurance business in connection with which a title insurance policy is issued to any of the following:
(c) Any person who is acting as or who is in the business of acting as agent, representative, attorney, or employee of any of the persons described in (a) or (b); provided, however, that this subdivision shall not be deemed to preclude payment by a title insurer of normal commission to an agent, representative or attorney of any of the persons described in the said subdivisions (a) or (b), but who is not the employee of any such person, except that if any such person entitled to receive and receiving commission hereunder stands in a fiduciary relation to any of the persons described in subdivisions (a) or (b), he must disclose in writing to such person the rate or amount of the commission to be received; further provided, that the commission received from the insurer may not be shared either directly or indirectly with any other person except a duly licensed agent who is not in the employment or under the control of any of the persons described in subdivisions (a) or (b) hereof.
(1) The rule is based, in part, upon recognition of the fact that the agent, representative or attorney of the purchaser or seller paying for the title insurance policy stands in a fiduciary or quasi-fiduciary relationship with such purchaser or seller and that the receipt by him of money or other economic benefit beyond that which such agent, representative or attorney is entitled to as normal commission for services rendered would be inconsistent with his fiduciary relationship in selecting the title insurance for the purchaser or seller. Given a fair disclosure of the rate or amount of such commission to such purchaser or seller, the payment of reasonable agents’ commissions is not inappropriate provided there is no division of such commissions in a manner which constitutes a rebate or a benefit to the lender. It is reasonable to assume that when there is no possibility of an unearned and undisclosed material personal benefit or rebate to the said agent, representative or attorney of the purchaser or seller, he would either make no recommendation as to the title insurer or would recommend a listing of title insurers known to be competitive in terms of price or service in order to enhance his own business reputation and competitive position.
(2) Any of the following activities by a title insurer will be deemed to constitute an unlawful rebate or inducement, but the listing of such activities is not to be construed as exhaustive of such unlawful activities and it may not be inferred that an omission from the listing constitutes a justification for engaging in a particular practice which has not been specifically listed. The term “such person” as used herein refers to any person described in subdivisions (a), (b), or (c) of Section 2:
(O) Buying from or selling to, or exchanging with, or offering to buy from, sell to, or exchange with any such person, shares of stock in the title insurer or any business concern controlling or controlled by or affiliated with the title insurer except for purchases or exchanges made through a general public offering.
Section 3. Rates, Rating Plans, and Rating Organizations. On or before the one hundred twentieth day following the effective date of this Regulation, title insurers shall file, or cause to be filed in their behalf by a duly constituted and qualified rating organization, their rates for title insurance policies together with the rating plans and rating systems used by them in the making of rates; and such rating plans and rating systems shall be so structured as to produce rates which are adequate, not excessive and not unfairly discriminatory. Such rates whether made and filed by the insurer independently or in its behalf by a lawfully constituted rating organization shall be adequate, not excessive, and not unfairly discriminatory and shall be approved by the Chief Insurance Commissioner prior to their use.