55 Pa. Code § 275.3
(a) Rights of the appellant. An appellant has the right to appear in person at the hearing and he may represent himself, or he may be represented. For food stamps, the appellant may also bring friends or relatives to the hearing; however the hearing examiner may limit the number of persons in attendance at the hearing if space limitations exist. The appellant or his representative, if any, have the following rights:
(3) To examine prior to the hearing, as well as during the hearing, documents which the county office, administering agency or social service provider will introduce as evidence in the hearing as well as the contents of the case files as provided for in § 105.5 (relating to access by an individual to his case file) or appropriate confidentiality regulations for the service program.
(iii) To obtain a hearing officer’s determination of whether the appellant may examine the material in question, the County Assistance Office, administering agency or social service provider will promptly provide the Office of Hearings and Appeals a summary of the situation which will include the following:
(b) Time limitations on right to appeal. An applicant or recipient must exercise his right of appeal within the following time limits. Appeals which do not meet the following time limitations will be dismissed without a hearing:
(3) When the county office, administering agency or service provider fails to send written notice which was required of the action and of the right of appeal or because of administrative error, ongoing delay or failure to take corrective action that should have been taken, the time limit in paragraphs (2) or (4) will not apply. For a period of 6 months from the date of the action or failure to act, the client shall have the right of appeal and shall exercise that right in writing. After 6 months from the date of the county office, administering agency or service provider action or failure to act, a written appeal may be filed with the agency provided that the client signs an affidavit stating the following:
The provisions of this § 275.3 amended through December 5, 1980, effective December 6, 1980, 10 Pa.B. 4594. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (54068) and (54069).
Failure to appeal the CAO’s proposed action within 30 days made the decision final and may not be collaterally attacked under § 227.24(d)(ii)(B)(II). Otero v. Department of Public Welfare, 517 A.2d 213 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).
Public assistance recipients must appeal within 30 days from date of county assistance officers written denial notice or the decision becomes final and immune to collateral attack. Otero v. Department of Public Welfare, 517 A.2d 213 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).
A remand was required to determine if any grounds existed to grant an appeal nunc pro tunc, hearing officer should have made findings on the factual arguments advanced by Medical Assistance applicant to support acceptance of appeal nunc pro tunc on equitable grounds. Martin v. Department of Public Welfare, 514 A.2d 204 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).
Where notice of denial of benefits stated only: ‘‘client failed to supply essential information . . .’’, cited irrelevant regulation, failed to indicate the essential information and failed to state the basis for denying after only 2 weeks from date of request, the notice was invalid on due process grounds and the 30 day appeal period set forth in § 275.3(b) was inapplicable. Martin v. Department of Public Welfare, 514 A.2d 204 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).
The good faith requirement for filing an appeal, as stated in 55 Pa. Code § 275.3(b)(3)(iii) modifies all elements of 55 Pa. Code § 275.3(b). Trant v. Department of Public Welfare, 452 A.2d 590 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1982).
Even where notice of action has been given, an extension of the time limit for appeal from 30 days to 6 months is allowed under 55 Pa. Code § 275.3(b)(3) because of an administrative error in supplying misinformation which causes a claimant to forego an appeal. Trant v. Department of Public Welfare, 452 A.2d 590 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1982).
The six month appeal period provided for in 55 Pa. Code § 275.3(b)(3) is inapplicable when written notice, though sent to an address other than that on the application for benefits, is actually received by the applicant. Clark v. Department of Public Welfare, 427 A.2d 712 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1981).
Even though a rejection notice may be deficient because sent to an address other than that on the application for benefits, the inadequacy is cured when the applicant actually receives the notice, and from the time of receipt the applicant has at best 30 days in which to appeal. Clark v. Department of Public Welfare, 427 A.2d 712 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1981).
A CBA error indicating the incorrect year in the deadline for an application for medical assistance is not a substantial enough error to deprive the applicant of notice of his right to appeal. Crail v. Department of Public Welfare, 416 A.2d 633 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980).
The denial notices to applicants need not state the appeal period, since the appeal period was stated in published regulations. Zani v. Department of Public Welfare, 400 A.2d 247 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1979).
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code § 105.5 (relating to access by an individual to his case file); 55 Pa. Code § 275.4 (relating to procedures); 55 Pa. Code § 1181.564 (relating to when an appeal is required to be filed); and 55 Pa. Code § 3041.166 (relating to hearing procedures).