234 Pa. Code Rule 902
(16) if applicable, any request for discovery.
The petition may, but need not, include concise argument or citation and discussion of authorities.
(2) On the first counseled petition in a death penalty case, no discovery shall be permitted at any stage of the proceedings, except upon leave of court after a showing of good cause.
(iv) The improper obstruction by government officials of the petitioner’s right of appeal where a meritorious appealable issue existed and was properly preserved in the trial court.’’
Deleted by statute.
‘‘(vi) The unavailability at the time of trial of exculpatory evidence that has subsequently become available and would have changed the outcome of the trial if it had been introduced.
(viii) A proceeding in a tribunal without jurisdiction.’’
‘‘(3) That the allegation of error has not been previously litigated or waived.’’
‘‘(4) That the failure to litigate the issue prior to or during trial . . . , or on direct appeal could not have been the result of any rational, strategic or tactical decision by counsel.’’ See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(2), (3), and (4). (Note: the statutory reference to unitary review in this paragraph is not shown in view of the Court’s 1997 suspension of the Capital Unitary Review Act.)
By statute, a court may not entertain a request for any form of relief in anticipation of the filing of a petition for post-conviction relief. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(a). For stays of execution, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(c) and Rule 909(A).
Paragraphs (A)(16) and (E) were added in 1997 to address requests for discovery. Paragraph (A)(16) requires that a request for discovery be included in the petition, if applicable. Paragraph (E) sets forth the standards for permitting discovery. Under paragraph (E)(1), which applies in all cases except on the first counseled petition in a death penalty case, no discovery is permitted at any stage of the proceedings, except upon leave of the court with a showing of exceptional circumstances. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(d)(2). Under paragraph (E)(2), which applies to first counseled petitions in death penalty cases, discovery is permitted only upon leave of court for good cause shown. For purposes of paragraph (E)(2), ‘‘first counseled petition’’ includes petitions on which defendants have elected to proceed pro se pursuant to Rule 904(F)(1)(a).
Second or subsequent petitions will not be entertained unless a strong prima facie showing is offered to demonstrate that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred. See Commonwealth v. Szuchon, 633 A.2d 1098, 1099 (Pa. 1993) (citing Commonwealth v. Lawson, 549 A.2d 107 (Pa. 1988)). This standard is met if the petitioner can demonstrate either: (1) that the proceedings resulting in the petitioner’s conviction were so unfair that a miscarriage of justice occurred which no civilized society can tolerate; or (2) that the petitioner is innocent of the crimes charged. See Commonwealth v. Szuchon, 633 A.2d 1098, 1100 (Pa. 1993).
It is expected that a form petition will be prepared incorporating the required contents set forth herein which will be available for distribution to uncounseled defendants. This rule is not intended to require an attorney to use a printed form or any other particular format in preparing a petition or an amended petition for post-conviction collateral relief, provided, of course, that the attorney must include in a petition or amended petition substantially all of the information set forth in this rule.
The petition should be typewritten or legibly handwritten.
Official Note
Previous Rule 1502 adopted January 24, 1968, effective August 1, 1968; rescinded December 11, 1981, effective June 27, 1982; rescission vacated June 4, 1982; rescinded February 1, 1989, effective July 1, 1989, and replaced by present Rules 1503 and 1505. Present Rule 1502 adopted February 1, 1989, effective July 1, 1989; amended August 11, 1997, effective immediately; amended July 23, 1999, effective September 1, 1999; Comment revised January 21, 2000, effective July 1, 2000; renumbered Rule 902 and Comment revised March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; amended February 26, 2002, effective July 1, 2002; Comment revised April 28, 2005, effective August 1, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 2855.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Final Report explaining the August 11, 1997 amendments published with the Court’s Order at 27 Pa.B. 4305 (August 23, 1997).
Final Report explaining the July 23, 1999 amendments concerning stays published with the Court’s Order at 29 Pa.B. 4167 (August 7, 1999).
Final Report explaining the January 21, 2000 Comment revision cross-referencing Rule 1504(F)(1)(a) published with the Court’s Order at 30 Pa.B. 624 (February 5, 2000).
Final Report explaining the March 1, 2000 reorganization and renumbering of the rules published with the Court’s Order at 30 Pa.B. 1478 (March 18, 2000).
Final Report explaining the February 26, 2002 amendments concerning entry of appearance by counsel published with the Court’s Order at 32 Pa.B. 1393 (March 16, 2002).
Final Report explaining the April 28, 2005 Comment revision published with the Court’s Order at 35 Pa.B. 2859 (May 14, 2005).
Comment
All privately retained counsel must enter an appearance as provided in Rule 904.
Paragraph (A)(14) was amended in 2002 to require the defendant to include verification that the attorney is authorized to file the petition.
Pursuant to paragraph (A)(6), the petition should include specific information about the sentence imposed, including whether the defendant is currently serving a sentence of imprisonment or probation for the crime; awaiting execution of a sentence of death for the crime; or serving a sentence which must expire before the defendant may commence serving the disputed sentence; the minimum and maximum terms of the sentence; the amount of fine or restitution, if any; and whether the defendant is released on parole. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a).
Sections 9543(a)(2), (3), and (4) of the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(2), (3), and (4), require that to be eligible for relief, the defendant must plead and prove by a preponderance of the evidence all of the following:
‘‘(2) That the conviction or sentence resulted from one or more of the following:
The provisions of this Rule 902 amended February 26, 2002, effective July 1, 2002, 32 Pa.B. 1391; amended April 28, 2005, effective August 1, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 2855. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (304143) to (304144) and (303709) to (303710).