Pa.R.D.E. 214
(c) Upon being advised that an attorney has been convicted of a crime, Disciplinary Counsel shall secure and file a certificate of such conviction with the Supreme Court.
(d)(1) Upon the filing with the Supreme Court of a certified copy of an order demonstrating that an attorney has been convicted of a crime, the Court may enter a rule directing the respondent-attorney to show cause why the respondent-attorney should not be placed on temporary suspension, which rule shall be returnable within ten days.
(5) At any time before a plea or verdict or after a guilty plea or verdict of guilt in the criminal proceeding, Disciplinary Counsel and the respondent-attorney’s may file with the Court a joint petition for temporary suspension of the respondent-attorney’s on the ground that the respondent-attorney’s temporary suspension is in the best interest of the respondent and the legal system.
Official Note
The subject of the summary proceedings authorized by subdivision (d) will ordinarily be limited to whether the condition triggering the application of subdivision (d) exists, i.e., proof that the respondent-attorney is the same person as the individual convicted of the offense charged, although the Court has the discretion to consider such subjects as mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The provision of subdivision (d)(3) permitting the respondent-attorney to continue representing existing clients for 30 days is intended to avoid undue hardship to clients and to permit a winding down of matters being handled by the respondent-attorney, and the permissible activities of the respondent-attorney are intended to be limited to only those necessary to accomplish those purposes.
(e) A certificate of a conviction of an attorney for a crime shall be conclusive evidence of the commission of that crime in any disciplinary proceeding instituted against the attorney based upon the conviction.
(f)(1) Upon the filing of a certificate of conviction of an attorney for a crime, Disciplinary Counsel may commence either an informal or formal proceeding under Enforcement Rule 208, except that Disciplinary Counsel may institute a formal proceeding before a hearing committee or special master by filing a petition for discipline with the Board without seeking approval for the prosecution of formal charges under Enforcement Rule 208(a)(3). If a petition for discipline is filed, a hearing on the petition shall be deferred until sentencing and all direct appeals from the conviction have been concluded. The sole issue at the hearing shall be the extent of the discipline or, where the Court has temporarily suspended the attorney under subdivision (d) of this rule, the final discipline to be imposed.
Official Note
subdivision (f)(1) authorizes Disciplinary Counsel to proceed under Rule 208 concurrently with the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction under subdivision (d) of this Rule.
(2) Notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1) that a hearing shall not be held until sentencing and all appeals from a conviction have been concluded, a respondent-attorney who has been temporarily suspended pursuant to this rule shall have the right to request an accelerated disposition of the charges which form the basis for the temporary suspension by filing a notice with the Board and Disciplinary Counsel requesting accelerated disposition. Within 30 days after filing of such a notice, Disciplinary Counsel shall file a petition for discipline, if such a petition has not already been filed, and the matter shall be assigned to a hearing committee for accelerated disposition. The assignment to a hearing committee shall take place within seven (7) days after the filing of such a notice or the filing of a petition for discipline, whichever occurs later. Thereafter the matter shall proceed and be concluded by the hearing committee, the Board and the Court without appreciable delay. If a petition for discipline is not timely filed or assigned to a hearing committee for accelerated disposition under this paragraph, the order of temporary suspension shall be automatically dissolved, but without prejudice to any pending or further proceedings under this rule.
Official Note
The ‘‘without appreciable delay’’ standard of subdivision (f)(2) of the rule is derived from Barry v. Barchi, 443 U. S. 55, 66 (1979). Appropriate steps should be taken to satisfy this requirement, such as continuous hearing sessions, procurement of daily transcript, fixing of truncated briefing schedules, conducting special sessions of the Board, etc.
The provisions of this Rule 214 amended through April 1, 1983, effective April 2, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 1179; amended February 7, 1989, effective February 25, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 763; amended November 17, 1989, effective December 9, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 5212; amended August 19, 1993, effective September 4, 1993, 23 Pa.B. 4204; amended March 5, 2004, effective March 20, 2004, 34 Pa.B. 1547; amended March 28, 2006, effective upon publication, 36 Pa.B. 1745; amended July 29, 2009, effective 30 days, 39 Pa.B. 4887; amended September 1, 2010, effective in sixty days, 40 Pa.B. 5292; amended March 19, 2012, effective in 30 days, 42 Pa.B. 1637; amended March 4, 2014, effective in 30 days, 44 Pa.B. 1749; amended April 18, 2019, effective in 30 days, 49 Pa.B. 2209. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (376213) to (376215).