201 Pa. Code Rule 605
In the interest of efficient administration of the judicial district, the president judge of the court of common pleas of a judicial district shall exercise general supervision and administrative authority over magisterial district courts within the judicial district. The administrative authority of the president judge over magisterial district courts within the judicial district includes, but is not limited to, and shall be governed by, the following:
(a) The president judge, in the interest of efficient administration of the judicial district:
(b) The magisterial district judge, subject to the provisions set forth above and in the interest of the efficient administration of the judicial district:
(3) Conduct of Magisterial District Judges—When a complaint is received with respect to the conduct of a magisterial district judge, the president judge may, in his or her discretion, review the matter with the affected magisterial district judge and take any action the president judge deems appropriate to ensure the efficient administration of justice, including, where warranted, informing the appropriate disciplinary authority. Contemporaneous notice of any such action taken by the president judge resulting in reassignment of cases or otherwise affecting the duties of the magisterial district judge shall be given to the Court Administrator.
Official Note
The substance of this rule was taken from Rule 17 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, rescinded March 26, 2015.
The Pennsylvania Constitution vests the Supreme Court with supervisory and administrative authority of the Unified Judicial System, including the power to prescribe general rules governing the practice, procedure, conduct, and administration of all courts, as well as the supervision of all officers of the Judicial Branch. Through this rule, the Supreme Court delegates general supervision and administrative authority over the magisterial district courts in a judicial district to the president judge. While the president judge, as in other matters, may delegate certain tasks to colleagues or administrators, the ultimate responsibility rests with the president judge.
This rule recognizes that magisterial district judges are the judicial officials charged with the legal and administrative responsibilities within their respective magisterial districts. Designed to further the efficient and effective administration of justice in the Unified Judicial System, this rule contemplates a cooperative approach to the administration of the magisterial district courts, acknowledging the supervisory role of the president judges to administer the magisterial district judge courts within their judicial district. See Canon 2, Rule 2.5 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges (requiring a magisterial district judge to cooperate with other magisterial district judges and court officials in the administration of court business).
Rule 605 was amended in 2021 to more specifically outline the authority, powers, and responsibilities of the president judge with regard to the management of the magisterial district courts. In so doing, however, it was not intended that this be an exclusive list of powers and responsibilities. Given the diverse needs of judicial districts throughout Pennsylvania, how president judges exercise this authority appropriately will vary. In general, president judges have broad authority with regard to the management of the magisterial district courts.
The term ‘‘authorized staff’’ as used in this rule means staff positions that have been approved and assigned by the president judge in accordance with all applicable personnel policies and procedures.
Paragraph (A)(2)(a)(i) gives president judges final authority to hire, supervise, and fire staff in the magisterial district courts in the judicial district. Consistent with the contemplated cooperative approach to the administration of the magisterial district courts, president judges should endeavor to involve the affected magisterial district judges in the relevant decisions, subject to the requirements of the remainder of paragraph (A)(2).
Paragraph (A)(2)(a)(ii) gives president judges authority to transfer or reassign magisterial district court staff as needed. It is contemplated that president judges will consult with and give sufficient notice to the affected magisterial district judges before making any staff transfers. However, extraordinary circumstances at times may require a president judge to exercise his or her authority to transfer or reassign magisterial district court staff, including personal staff, without consultation with the magisterial district judge. For example, the president judge is responsible for ensuring compliance with the Unified Judicial System’s Policy on Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity and the Code of Conduct for Employees of the Unified Judicial System and may need to enforce these Unified Judicial System policies without consulting the magisterial district judge.
Nothing in paragraph (A)(2)(a)(v) is intended to circumvent any training program established or required by the Supreme Court or the Court Administrator.
With regard to paragraphs (A)(2)(b)(i), (ii) and (iv), see 42 Pa.C.S. § § 102 and 2301(a)(1), and Canon 2, Rules 2.3(B), 2.8(B), 2.9(A)(3) and (D), 2.10(C), 2.12 and 2.13, of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, relating to the performance of duties of judicial office impartially, competently, and diligently and requiring similar conduct of court staff.
With regard to paragraph (A)(3), see Canon 2, Rule 2.1 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges (Giving Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office). The provisions of former Pa.R.M.D.J. 103 (Office Schedules) were incorporated into paragraph (A)(3).
As to paragraph (A)(4), see Canon 2, Rule 2.5 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges (Competence, Diligence and Cooperation). The magisterial district judge in any district being audited will cooperate fully and will instruct his or her staff to do likewise.
As to paragraph (A)(5), compare Pa.R.Crim.P. 131(B), relating to central locations for preliminary hearings and summary trials. In addition, if the judicial district is part of a regional administrative unit, magisterial district judges may be assigned to any other judicial district in the unit. See Pa.R.M.D.J. 112 and Pa.R.J.A. No. 701(E).
With regard to paragraph (B)(1), president judges are encouraged to meet regularly with the magisterial district judges in the judicial district to foster and maintain open lines of communication regarding the management of the magisterial district courts.
With regard to paragraph (B)(2), see Canon 2, Rules 2.1 and 2.5 (Giving Precedence to Duties of Judicial Office; Competence, Diligence and Cooperation), and Canon 3, Rules 3.1(A), 3.7(A)-(B), 3.8, 3.10, and 3.11(C), of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, relating to conducting personal and extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with the obligations of judicial office.
Nothing in paragraph (B)(3) is intended to contradict or circumvent the constitutionally established process for the suspension, removal, and discipline of magisterial district judges. See Pa. Const. art. V, § 18; see also 207 Pa. Code Part III (Judicial Conduct Board Rules of Procedure) and Part IV (Court of Judicial Discipline Rules of Procedure). Except as provided by law or rule, president judges do not have the authority to suspend or discipline magisterial district judges.
The provisions of this Rule 605 amended April 14, 2021, effective immediately, 51 Pa.B. 2261. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (376692) to (376694).