(1) The Board shall reverse a land use decision when:
- (a) The governing body exceeded its jurisdiction;
- (b) The decision is unconstitutional; or
- (c) The decision violates a provision of applicable law and is prohibited as a matter of law.
(2) The Board shall remand a land use decision for further proceedings when:
- (a) The findings are insufficient to support the decision, except as provided in ORS 197.835(11)(b);
- (b) The decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the whole record;
- (c) The decision is flawed by procedural errors that prejudice the substantial rights of the petitioner(s);
- (d) The decision improperly construes the applicable law, but is not prohibited as a matter of law; or
- (e) All parties stipulate in writing to remand.
(3) The Board may reverse or remand a land use decision in part when:
- (a) The decision adopts a change to an acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation;
- (b) The decision contains a severability clause; and
- (c) The affirmed parts, standing alone, are complete and capable of being executed consistent with the local government’s legislative intent.
Statutory/Other Authority
ORS 197.820(4) & 197.835(1)
Statutes/Other Implemented
ORS 197.835
History
LUBA 5-2023, amend filed 12/20/2023, effective 01/01/2024
LUBA 2-2023, temporary amend filed 09/21/2023, effective 09/25/2023 through 12/31/2023
LUBA 3-2013, f. 12-12-13, cert. ef. 1-1-14
LUBA 1-1998, f. 2-12-98, cert. ef. 3-1-98
LUBA 1-1987, f. & ef. 12-30-87