Okla. Stat. tit. 5, Rule 2.10
Code of Judicial Conduct
Chapter 1, App. 4
Rule 2.10 Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases
(E) Subject to the requirements of paragraph (A), a judge may respond directly or through a third party to allegations in the media or elsewhere concerning the judge's conduct in a matter.
COMMENT
[1] This Rule's restrictions on judicial speech are essential to the maintenance of the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary.
[2] Depending upon the circumstances, the judge should consider whether it may be preferable for a third party, rather than the judge, to respond or issue statements in connection with allegations concerning the judge's conduct in a matter.
[3] This Rule does not prohibit a judge from commenting on proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity or represents a client as permitted by these rules. In cases in which the judge is a litigant in an official capacity, such as a writ of mandamus, the judge must not comment publicly.
RULE 2.10
Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases
Approved by order of the Supreme Court, 2010 OK 90, effective April 15, 2011.