Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 4-215
(b) If provisional settlement for an
item does not become final, the item is not finally paid.
(c) If provisional settlement for an
item between the presenting and payor banks is made through a clearing-house or by debits or credits in an account between them, then to the extent that provisional debits or credits for the item are entered in accounts between the presenting and payor banks or between the presenting and successive prior collecting banks seriatim, they become final upon final payment of the items by the payor bank.
(d) If a
collecting bank receives a settlement for an item which is or becomes final, the bank is accountable to its customer for the amount of the item and any provisional credit given for the item in an account with its customer becomes final.
(e) Subject to (i) applicable law stating a time for availability of funds and (ii) any
right of the bank to apply the credit to an obligation of the customer, credit given by a bank for an item in a customer's account becomes available for withdrawal as of right:
(f) Subject to applicable law stating a time for availability of funds and any
right of a bank to apply a deposit to an obligation of the depositor, a deposit of money becomes available for withdrawal as of right at the opening of the bank's next banking day after receipt of the deposit.
Oklahoma Code Comment
This Section was pre-revision Section
4-213. Reg. CC requires that all settlements in the forward check collection process be final when made. 12 C.F.R. §229.36(d). Compare, before Reg. CC, Pracht v. Oklahoma State Bank, 592 P.2d 976 (Okla. 1979). However, this does not mean the payor bank may not collect from the bank to which a dishonored check is resumed pursuant to 12 C.F.R. § 229.30. Nor is the payor's duty to return the item, or send written notice of dishonor or nonpayment if the item is unavailable (such as in truncation), to be confused with the duty under 12 C.F.R. § 229.33 to send notice of nonpayment in certain cases.
Note that subsection (a) drops completion of the process of posting (which was never defined because Oklahoma did not adopt pre-revision Section
4-109, which defined it) as a point of payment and as a cut-off point for legal process and stop payment orders under Section 4-303. This makes it important to consider the adoption of a cut-off hour under subsection 4-303(a)(5). A bank should be slow to waive any cut-off it may set to favor a good customer whose stop order is late, as such conduct may raise a question of good faith. However, given that good faith is not a basis for action independent of contract or a duty under Section 1-203 (see Rodgers v. Tecumseh Bank, 756 P.2d 1223 (Okla. 1988); Frontier Fed Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Commercial Bank, N.A., 806 P.2d 1140 (Okla. Ct.App. 1990)), and the item has not been "paid" (for UCC purposes), the matter would seem to be left to the bank's discretion.
Laws 1991, SB 25, c. 117, § 119, eff. January 1, 1992.