(b) The State has previously enacted laws concerning sex offenders, including the Sex Offender Registration Act, the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act, the Electronic Security and Targeting of On-Line Predators Act (e-STOP) and laws restricting certain sex offenders who are under probation or parole supervision from entering school grounds. Chapter 568 of the Laws of 2008 continues the State's efforts in the area of sex offender management and specifically in the area of the placement and housing of sex offenders. Sex offender management, and the placement of housing of sex offenders, are areas that have been, and will continue to be, matters addressed by the State. These regulations further the State's coordinated and comprehensive policies in these areas, and are intended to provide further guidance to relevant State and local agencies in applying the State's approach.

(c ) Public safety is a primary concern and these regulations are intended to better protect children, vulnerable populations and the general public from sex offenders. The State's coordinated and comprehensive approach also recognizes the necessity to provide emergency shelter to individuals in need, including those who are sex offenders, and the importance of stable housing and support in allowing offenders to live in and re-enter the community and become law-abiding and productive citizens. These regulations are based upon, and are intended to further best practices and effective strategies to achieve these goals.

(d) In implementing this statute and the State's comprehensive approach, DOP, DPCA, OTDA and the Division of Criminal Justice Services' Office of Sex Offender Management (DCJS/OSOM) recognize that:

1. (1) not all sex offenders are equally dangerous. Some sex offenders may pose a high risk of committing a new sexual crime; others may pose only a low risk;
2. (2) all reasonable efforts should be made in to avoid an ill-advised concentration of sex offenders in certain neighborhoods and localities. What constitutes such a concentration will depend on many factors, and may vary depending on housing availability and the locality and community. In addition, it is sometimes safer to house sex offenders together. Law enforcement, probation, and parole officers may more effectively monitor offenders, and service providers may more easily offer transitional services to offenders in these congregate settings. Further, some social services officials and departments rely on congregate housing for sex offenders who seek emergency shelter because of the limited, or lack of other housing options available for this population. All public officials who are responsible for finding or approving housing for sex offenders should recognize that an over-concentration of sex offenders may create risks and burdens on the surrounding community, and that their responsibility is to make judgments that are reasonable under the circumstances;
3. (3) all social services districts are required by statute, regulation and directive to arrange temporary housing assistance for eligible homeless individuals, including those who are sex offenders;
4. (4) to reduce recidivism it is important that offenders be able to re-enter society and become productive and law-abiding citizens whenever possible. A stable living situation and access to employment and support services are important factors that can help offenders to successfully re-enter society;
5. (5) maintaining and/or finding suitable housing for sex offenders is an enormous challenge that impacts all areas of the State. Offenders reside in all regions of the State and may have long-established residences in their respective communities. Even offenders who do not have such long-established relationships are often discharged from prison to the community where they previously lived. As a result, it is not appropriate for any one community or county to bear an inappropriate burden in housing sex offenders because another community has attempted to shift its responsibility for those offenders onto other areas of the State. The proliferation of local ordinances imposing residency restrictions upon sex offenders, while well-intentioned, have made it more challenging for the State and local authorities to address the difficulties in finding secure and appropriate housing for sex offenders;
6. (6) decisions as to the housing and supervision of sex offenders should take into account all relevant factors and no one factor will necessarily be dispositive. These factors should include, but not be limited to, the factors enumerated in the statute, the risk posed by the offender, the nature of the underlying offense, whether housing offenders together or apart is safer and more feasible, the most effective method to supervise and provide services to offenders, and the availability of appropriate housing, employment, treatment and support.