1. (a) A visual impact assessment (VIA) to determine the extent and assess the significance of facility visibility. The components of the VIA shall include identification of visually sensitive resources, viewshed mapping, confirmatory visual assessment fieldwork, visual simulations (photographic overlays), cumulative visual impact analysis, and proposed Visual Impacts Minimization and Mitigation Plan as outlined in subdivision (d) of this section. The VIA shall address the following issues:

   1. (1) the character and visual quality of the existing landscape;
   2. (2) the visibility of the facility, including visibility of facility operational characteristics, such as wind turbine lighting, glare from solar panel arrays;
   3. (3) the visibility of all above-ground interconnections and roadways to be constructed within the facility as determined by the viewshed analysis;
   4. (4) the appearance of the facility upon completion, including building/structure size, architectural design, facade colors and texture, and site lighting;
   5. (5) the proposed facility lighting (including lumens, location and direction of lights for facility site and/or task use, and safety including worker safety and tall structure marking requirements) and similar features;
   6. (6) representative views (photographic overlays) of the facility, including relevant front, side and rear views, indicating approximate elevations;
   7. (7) the nature and degree of visual change resulting from construction of the facility and above-ground interconnections;
   8. (8) the nature and degree of visual change resulting from operation of the facility and above-ground interconnections;
   9. (9) an analysis and description of related operational effects of the facility such as visible plumes, shading, glare, and shadow flicker; and
   10. (10) a description of all visual resources that would be affected by the facility.

2. (b) The viewshed analysis component of the VIA shall be conducted as follows:

   1. (1) Viewshed maps depicting areas of facility visibility within two miles of a solar facility and five miles of a wind facility, as well as any potential visibility from specific significant visual resources beyond the specified study area, shall be prepared and presented on a 1:24,000 scale recent edition topographic base map. A line of sight profile shall also be done for resources of statewide concern located within the VIA study area. The viewshed maps shall provide an indication of areas of potential visibility based on topography and vegetation, the highest elevation of facility structures and distance zone (foreground, midground and background areas). The potential screening effects of vegetation shall also be shown. Visually-sensitive sites, cultural and historical resources, representative viewpoints, photograph locations, and public vantage points within the viewshed study area shall be included on the map(s) or an overlay. An overlay indicating landscape similarity zones shall be included.
   2. (2) The VIA shall include a description of the methodology used to develop the viewshed maps, including software, baseline information, and sources of data.
   3. (3) The viewshed mapping shall be used to determine the potential visibility from viewpoints to be analyzed (as indicated in the following paragraph (4) of this subdivision) and locations of viewer groups in the vicinity of the facility, as determined pursuant to the pre-application meeting(s) held pursuant to section 900-1.3(a) of this Part. These shall include recreational areas, residential and business locations, historic properties (listed or eligible for listing on the State or National Register of Historic Places), and travelers (interstate and other highway users).

   4. (4) In developing the application, the applicant shall confer with municipal planning representatives, the office, and where appropriate, OPRHP and/or APA in its selection of important or representative viewpoints. Viewpoint selection is based upon the following criteria:

      1. (i) representative or typical views from unobstructed or direct line-of-sight views;
      2. (ii) significance of viewpoints, designated scenic resources, areas or features, which features typically include, but are not limited to: landmark landscapes; wild, scenic or recreational rivers administered respectively by either the NYSDEC or the APA pursuant to ECL article 15 or Department of Interior pursuant to 16 USC section 1271; forest preserve lands; scenic vistas specifically identified in the Adirondack Park State land master plan; conservation easement lands; scenic byways designated by the Federal or State governments; scenic districts and scenic roads, designated by the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation pursuant to ECL article 49; scenic areas of statewide significance; State parks; sites listed or eligible for listing on the National or State Registers of Historic Places; areas covered by scenic easements, public parks or recreation areas; locally designated historic or scenic districts and scenic overlooks; and high-use public areas;
      3. (iii) level of viewer exposure (i.e., frequency of viewers or relative numbers, including residential areas, or high-volume roadways);
      4. (iv) proposed land uses; and

      5. (v) assessment of visual impacts pursuant to the requirements of adopted local laws or ordinances.

         (c) Visual contrast evaluation.

   5. (1) Photographic simulations of the facility shall be prepared from the representative viewpoints to demonstrate the post-construction appearance of the facility. Where vegetation screening is relied on for facility mitigation, leaf-off and leaf-on simulation shall be provided.
   6. (2) Additional revised simulations illustrating mitigation shall be prepared for those observation points for which mitigation is proposed in the application.

   7. (3) Each set of existing and simulated views of the facility shall be compared and rated and the results of the VIA shall be summarized. Documentation of the steps followed in the rating and assessment methodology shall be provided including results of rating impact panels and a description of the qualifications of the individuals serving on the panels. Where visual impacts from the facility are identified, contrast minimization and mitigation measures shall be identified, and the extent to which they effectively minimize such impact shall be discussed.

      (d) Visual impacts minimization and mitigation plan.

      The visual impacts minimization and mitigation plan shall include proposed minimization and mitigation alternatives based on an assessment of mitigation strategies, including screening (landscaping), architectural design, visual offsets, relocation or rearranging facility components, reduction of facility component profiles, alternative technologies, facility color and design, lighting options for work areas and safety requirements, and lighting options for FAA aviation hazard lighting. The facility design shall incorporate the following measures for the visual impacts minimization and mitigation plan:

   8. (1) advertisements, conspicuous lettering, or logos identifying the facility owner, turbine manufacturer, solar module manufacturer, or any other supplier entity, other than warning and safety signs, shall not be allowed;
   9. (2) the electrical collection system shall be located underground, to the extent practicable. Structures shall only be constructed overhead for portions where necessary based on engineering, construction, or environmental constraints;
   10. (3) electric collection and transmission facilities design shall specify use of either wood poles or steel pole structures; steel poles shall be self-weathering (such as corten or equivalent) or other surface finish in dark brown or green color, non-glare finish;
   11. (4) non-specular conductors shall be used for any overhead portions of the transmission line and the electric collection system; and
   12. (5) for wind facilities, wind turbines, towers and blades shall be Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved white or off-white colors to avoid the need for daytime aviation hazard lighting, unless otherwise mandated by FAA, and non-reflective finishes shall be used on wind turbines to minimize reflected glare.

   13. (6) Shadow flicker for wind facilities. Shadow flicker shall be limited to 30 hours per year at any non-participating residence, subject to verification using shadow prediction and operational controls at appropriate wind turbines. The visual impacts minimization and mitigation plan shall include:

       1. (i) analysis of a full year of hourly potential and realistic receptor-specific predicted flicker based on sunshine probabilities, operational projections, and facility design;
       2. (ii) a protocol for monitoring operational conditions and potential flicker exposure at the wind turbine locations identified in the updated analysis, based on meteorological conditions;
       3. (iii) details of the shadow detection and prevention technology that will be adopted for real-time meteorological monitoring and operational control of turbines;
       4. (iv) schedule and protocol for temporary turbine shutdowns during periods that produce flicker to meet required shadow flicker limits; and
       5. (v) shielding or blocking measures (such as landscape plantings and window treatments) may also be implemented at receptor locations that exceed the 30-hour annual limit, with approval by the resident receptor.
   14. (7) Glare for solar facilities. Solar panels shall have anti-reflective coatings and the visual impacts minimization and mitigation plan shall include an analysis using Sandia National Laboratories Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Tool (SGHAT) methodology or equivalent, that solar glare exposure at any non-participating residence, airport or public roadway will be avoided or minimized, and will not result in complaints, impede traffic movements or create safety hazards.
   15. (8) Planting plans which shall include the facility substation; energy storage structures; and the POI switchyard; and for components of solar generating facilities as appropriate to facility setting.

   16. (9) A lighting plan(s), which shall address:

       1. (i) security lighting needs at substation and switchyard sites, and any exterior equipment storage yards;
       2. (ii) plan and profile figures to demonstrate the lighting area needs and proposed lighting arrangement and illumination levels to provide safe working conditions at the collection substation site, and any exterior equipment storage yards or other locations;

       3. (iii) exterior lighting design shall be limited to lighting required for health, safety, security, emergencies and operational purposes and shall be specified to avoid off-site lighting effects as follows:

          1. (a) using task lighting as appropriate to perform specific tasks; limiting the maximum total outdoor lighting output based on the lowest allowable OSHA limits; task lighting fixtures shall be designed to be placed at the lowest practical height and directed to the ground and/or work areas to avoid being cast skyward or over long distances, incorporate shields and/or louvers where practicable, and capable of manual or auto-shut off switch activation rather than motion detection;
          2. (b) requiring full cutoff fixtures, with no drop-down optical elements (that can spread illumination and create glare) for permanent exterior lighting, consistent with OSHA requirements and adopted local laws or ordinances, including development standards for exterior industrial lighting, manufacturer’s cut sheets of all proposed lighting fixtures shall be provided; and
          3. (c) for wind facilities, lighting shall be installed on turbines for aviation hazard marking as specified by FAA. The applicant shall file a Notice for a Marking and Lighting Study of Aircraft Detection Lighting System(s) (ADLS) and dimmable lighting options with the FAA/Department of Defense (DOD) seeking a written determination approving the use of ADLS or other dimmable lighting option at the Project. If FAA/DOD determine that ADLS or dimmable lighting options are not appropriate for the project, or if the applicant determines installation of ADLS or dimmable lighting options are not technically feasible, the applicant shall consider other means of minimizing lighting effects, such as use of low-intensity lighting, and synchronization of lighting activation with adjoining wind farms.

Exhibit 8 shall contain: