N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 11, § 410.6
(a) No entity shall be qualified for certification as an external appeal agent if it owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or exercises common control with any of the following:
(b) An applicant for certification as an external appeal agent shall submit a sworn statement setting forth that none of the control affiliations proscribed in subdivision (a) of this section apply to the applicant, and that the applicant, its medical director and each of its owners, officers, directors and management employees, either:
(2) provides a list of those material familial, financial and professional affiliations, each of which may, upon certification, result in a prohibited conflict of interest in connection with an external appeal because of such affiliation with:
(c) Following certification:
(d) The applicant shall submit a detailed written description of its policies, processes and procedures for ensuring, in accordance with the criteria set forth in subdivisions (b) and (c) and paragraphs (e)(2)-(4) of this section and section 410.5(h)(2) of this Part, that appeals will be conducted by impartial clinical peer reviewers, for the reporting and review of clinical peer reviewer conflicts of interest and for assigning or reassigning an appeal where a conflict or potential conflict is identified and further, that the applicant, its medical director and each of its owners, officers, directors, management employees and clinical peer reviewers have no material familial, financial or professional affiliation with the insured whose health care service is the subject of an appeal assigned to it subsequent to certification as an external appeal agent or with the insured's designee.
(e) Unavoidable conflicts; minimization.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in accordance with section 4913(b) of the Insurance Law and section 4913.2 of the Public Health Law:
(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Part, a certified external appeal agent may assign an appeal to a clinical peer reviewer with unique expertise and experience with respect to a health care service which is relevant to an appeal for reasons which may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to: