N.M. Stat. Ann. § 76-12-16
D. The association may cause the original of a contract or an authenticated copy thereof to be filed in the office of the county clerk of the county in which the products described in the contract, or any part thereof, are or will at some future time be situated. Such contracts shall describe the property or services affected, the manner in which they are affected and the time for which they are affected and shall state the names and residences of the parties to the contract.
The filing of a contract in conformity to the provisions of this section shall operate as notice thereof to all subsequent purchasers and incumbrancers of so much of said property as is at the time mentioned in the contract located in the county or counties wherein such contract or authenticated copy thereof is filed; provided that when property subject to such a contract is moved into this state, or from one county to another, any previous filing of the contract shall not operate as notice as against subsequent creditors, purchasers, mortgagees or encumbrancers for a longer period than one hundred twenty days after such removal, but such contract must be refiled in the county to which the chattel is removed and in which it is permanently located. The fees for filing such contracts shall be twenty-five cents (25¢) for each contract.
History: Laws 1937, ch. 152, § 16; 1941 Comp., § 48-1316; 1953 Comp., § 45-14-16.
Cross references. — For injunctions, see Rule 1-066 NMRA.
Compiler's notes. — For similar provisions in earlier act, see Laws 1925, ch. 99, §§ 13, 20 and 21.
Contract enforceable. — Cooperative marketing association without capital stock and operated for mutually beneficial purpose could enforce performance of grower's contract to sell alfalfa to it exclusively, in suit for specific performance or for injunction against contract breach; rule that contract for delivery of ordinary article of commerce would not be compelled by specific performance was not applicable, as action for damages would not afford adequate remedy. Elephant Butte Alfalfa Ass'n v. Rouault, 1926-NMSC-009, 33 N.M. 136, 262 P. 185.
Right of cooperative marketing association to compel specific performance of member's contract to sell alfalfa to it exclusively would not be denied on grounds that it would require constant court supervision for long period of time and possibly involve pursuit of member from place to place; such rule was one of decision, and not limitation on jurisdiction of court of equity. Elephant Butte Alfalfa Ass'n v. Rouault, 1926-NMSC-009, 33 N.M. 136, 262 P. 185.
Association not liable for losses. — Agreement between members and nonprofit agricultural cooperative marketing association, making association sole marketing agency for members' onions and requiring association to gather, harvest and haul same at expense of individual members, created relationship of principal and agent; association was bargaining agent, not independent enterprise, did not take title to onion crop and was not liable for losses due to delay in making sales absent unreasonable exercise of discretion. Santo Tomas Produce Ass'n v. Smith, 1961-NMSC-080, 68 N.M. 436, 362 P.2d 977.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 18 Am. Jur. 2d Cooperative Associations § 14.
Validity and construction of provision for liquidated damages in contract with cooperative marketing association, 12 A.L.R.2d 130.
3 C.J.S. Agriculture § 145.