N.M. Stat. Ann. § 74-4-4.3
A. For purposes of developing or assisting in the development of any rules, conducting any study, taking any corrective action or enforcing the provisions of the Hazardous Waste Act, upon request of the secretary or his authorized representative:
(1) any person who generates, stores, treats, transports, disposes of or otherwise handles or has handled hazardous wastes shall furnish information relating to such hazardous wastes and permit the secretary or his authorized representatives:
(2) any person who owns or operates a storage tank, or any tank subject to study under Section 9009 of the [federal] Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 that is used for storing regulated substances, shall furnish information relating to such tanks, including their associated equipment and their contents, conduct monitoring or testing, permit the secretary or his authorized representative at all reasonable times to have access to and to copy all records relating to such tanks and permit the secretary or his authorized representative to have access for corrective action. For the purposes of developing or assisting in the development of any rule, conducting any study, taking corrective action or enforcing the provisions of the Hazardous Waste Act, the secretary or his authorized representative is authorized to:
B. Any person owning property to which access is necessary in order to investigate or clean up a facility where hazardous waste is generated, stored, treated or disposed of, or where storage tanks are located, shall:
(2) provide access to such property for structures or equipment necessary to monitoring or cleanup of hazardous wastes or leaking from storage tanks; provided that:
F. In submitting data under the Hazardous Waste Act, a person required to provide such data may:
History: 1978 Comp., § 74-4-4.3, enacted by Laws 1981 (1st S.S.), ch. 8, § 7; 1987, ch. 179, § 5; 1989, ch. 322, § 5; 2001, ch. 325, § 4.
Bracketed material. — The bracketed word "federal" was inserted by the compiler and it is not part of the law.
Cross references. — For the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 6901 et seq. For Section 9009 of that act, see 42 U.S.C. § 6991h.
For Section 1905 of Title 18 of the United States Code, see the Trade Secrets Act.
The 2001 amendment, effective July 1, 2001, substituted "secretary" for "director" throughout the section; deleted "underground" preceding "storage tank" and "storage tanks" throughout the section; substituted "department" for "division" in Subsection D; and made stylistic changes.
Areas subject to inspection. — Regardless of whether each specific part of the premises is subject to regulation, the statute clearly allows an inspection of all areas where the hazardous waste is being generated, whether it is in an enclosed facility or not. N.M. Envtl. Improvement Div. v. Climax Chem. Co., 1986-NMCA-137, 105 N.M. 439, 733 P.2d 1322, cert. denied, 105 N.M. 421, 733 P.2d 869.
Search warrant required in absence of consent. — In the event consent to enter and inspect premises for compliance with this article is denied, an administrative search warrant is required. N.M. Envtl. Improvement Div. v. Climax Chem. Co., 1986-NMCA-137, 105 N.M. 439, 733 P.2d 1322, cert. denied, 105 N.M. 421, 733 P.2d 869.
Venue in action for search warrant. — An action by which the environmental improvement division sought an administrative warrant for inspection under this article was a transitory action and venue was controlled by 38-3-1A NMSA 1978, which allows an action to be brought in a county where the plaintiff resides. N.M. Envtl. Improvement Div. v. Climax Chem. Co., 1986-NMCA-137, 105 N.M. 439, 733 P.2d 1322, cert. denied, 105 N.M. 421, 733 P.2d 869.
No conversion or trespass by private contractor. — Where private contractor acted pursuant to a valid administrative search and seizure warrant, the affidavits supporting the application for the warrant set forth probable cause for issuance of the warrant, and the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act permitted seizure of hazardous waste, there was no conversion or trespass by the private contractor. Eden v. Voss, 105 Fed. Appx. 234 (10th Cir. 2004).