N.M. Stat. Ann. § 7-9-46
G. As used in this section:
History: 1953 Comp., § 72-16A-14.1, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 144, § 36; 1992, ch. 100, § 4; 2012, ch. 5, § 4; 2013, ch. 160, § 9; 2021, ch. 65, § 13; 2021, ch. 66, § 2; 2023, ch. 85, § 14; 2025, ch. 130, § 69.
Repeals. — Laws 2023, ch. 85, § 27 repealed Laws 2021, ch. 65, § 13, effective July 1, 2023.
The 2025 amendment, effective July 1, 2025, revised reporting requirements; deleted former Subsection E and redesignated former Subsection F as Subsection E; and added new Subsection F.
The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, clarified when alternative evidence may be used to support the deduction for gross receipts tax for manufacturers and manufacturing service providers; in Subsection A, after "nontaxable transaction certificate to the seller", added "or provides alternative evidence pursuant to Section 7-9-43 NMSA 1978", and after "The buyer", deleted "delivering the nontaxable transaction certificate"; in subsection B, added "or provides alternative evidence pursuant to Section 7-9-43 NMSA 1978; provided that if the seller is a utility company, an agreement with the department pursuant to Section 7-1-21.1 NMSA 1978 and a nontaxable transaction certificate shall be required"; and in Subsection C, after "nontaxable transaction certificate to the seller", added "or provides alternative evidence pursuant to Section 7-9-43 NMSA 1978", and after the next occurrence of "nontaxable transaction certificate", added "or alternative evidence".
The 2021 amendment, effective January 1, 2022, added manufacturing service providers to a gross receipts tax deduction for manufacturers, and defined "manufacturing consumable", as used in this section; in the section heading, deleted "tax", and added "and manufacturing service providers"; in Subsection B, after "Receipts from selling", deleted "tangible personal property that is", preceding "consumable", added "manufacturing", and after "consumable", deleted "and used in such a way that it is consumed in the manufacturing process of a product, provided that the tangible personal property is not a tool or equipment used to create the manufactured product, to a person engaged in the business of manufacturing that product and who delivers a nontaxable transaction certificate to the seller" and added "to a manufacturer or a manufacturing service provider", after "may be deducted", deleted "in the following percentages", and deleted former Paragraphs B(1) through B(5) and added "if the buyer delivers a nontaxable transaction certificate to the seller"; added a new Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections C through F as Subsection D through G, respectively; and in Subsection G, in the introductory clause, after "As used in", deleted "Subsection B of", in Paragraph G(1), added "manufacturing", after "personal property", added "other than qualified equipment or an ingredient or component part of a manufactured product", after "gases", deleted "repair parts, spares", and deleted former Paragraph F(2) and added Paragraphs G(2) and G(3).
The 2013 amendment, effective July 1, 2013, provided a definition of "consumable" for purposes of the deduction of receipts from sales to manufacturers; in Subsection B, in the introductory sentence, after "tangible personal property that is", added "a consumable and"; and added Subsection F.
Applicability. — Laws 2013, ch. 160, § 14 provided that Laws 2013, ch. 160, § 9 applies to gross receipts received on or after July 1, 2013.
The 2012 amendment, effective January 1, 2013, provided a deduction for receipts from selling tangible personal property that is consumed in the manufacturing process of a product and added Paragraphs B, C, D and E.
The 1992 amendment, effective July 1, 1992, inserted "governmental gross receipts" in the section heading; inserted "or from governmental gross receipts" in the first sentence; and substituted "that" for "which" in the second sentence.
Entitlement to manufacturing deduction not found. — A biotechnology company whose expertise was in the diagnosis of genetic disorders that could be detected through the appearance of chromosomes, and who produced tangible objects that were provided to its customers, such as a written report of its experts' diagnosis and a laminated karyotype, which consisted of photographs of chromosomes that were numbered and pasted onto a piece of laminated cardboard, did not establish its entitlement to a manufacturing deduction, since the company could not identify any out-of-state purchases that would be subject to the compensating tax of products incorporated into its reports or laminated karyotypes. The department, whose assessment is assumed correct, had identified as subject to the compensating tax such items as microscopes, sinks, and furniture, which undoubtedly were not incorporated into the documents or laminated karyotypes. Vivigen, Inc. v. Minzner, 1994-NMCA-027, 117 N.M. 224, 870 P.2d 1382.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Sales or use tax upon containers or packaging materials purchased by manufacturer or processor for use with goods he distributes, 4 A.L.R.4th 581.
Items or materials exempt from use tax as becoming component part or ingredient of manufactured or processed article, 89 A.L.R.5th 493.