N.M. Stat. Ann. § 7-38-21
A. A property owner may protest:
B. A property owner may protest pursuant to Subsection A of this section, either by:
History: 1953 Comp., § 72-31-21, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 258, § 61; 1978 Comp., § 7-38-21; 1981, ch. 37, § 71; 1983, ch. 215, § 1; 2001, ch. 24, § 1; 2015, ch. 73, § 19; 2023, ch. 36, § 5; 2026, ch. 9, § 3.
Cross references. — For definition of "director," see 7-35-2 NMSA 1978.
The 2026 amendment, effective February 25, 2026, provided that a property owner may protest a pending claim for an exemption, and made certain technical amendments; in Subsection A, added new paragraph designations "(1)" through "(4)"; in Paragraph A(3), after "exemption or" deleted "for" and added "a pending claim for an exemption; or"; added new subsection designation "B," and redesignated former Subsections B and C as Subsections C and D, respectively, and in Subsection B, after the subsection designation, added "A property owner may protest pursuant to Subsection A of this section"; and in Subsection C, after each occurrence of "Subsection" changed "A" to "B".
The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, clarified the process for protesting the value or classification of property determined by a county assessor; in the section heading, added "county-assessed property"; in Subsection A, after "classification determined", added "by the county assessor", in Paragraph A(1), after "filing", added "a petition with the county assessor", and after "Property Tax Code", deleted "a petition of protest with", and deleted Subparagraphs A(1)(a) and A(1)(b).
The 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, provided for protests of property valuation to be filed with the administrative hearings office; in Subsection A, after "determined for", deleted "his" and added "the property owner’s" and after “allocation of value of”, deleted “his” and added “the”; in Subsection A, Paragraph (1), after "filing", added "as provided in the Property Tax Code"; in Subsection A, Paragraph (1)(a), after "the", deleted "director" and added "administrative hearings office"; in Subsection A, Paragraph (1)(b), after "county assessor", deleted "as provided in the Property Tax Code"; in Subsection A, Paragraph (2), after "paying", deleted "his" and added "the property owner’s"; in Subsection B, after "provided", deleted "under" and added “in”; and in Subsection C, after "application to", deleted "his" and added "the property owner’s", and after "paying", deleted "his" and added "the property owner’s".
The 2001 amendment, effective June 15, 2001, inserted "or for a limitation on increase in value" in Subsection A.
Protest or refund. — The alternate methods of protesting the rejection of a tax exemption set out in Subsections A(1) and A(2) are separate and distinct. Where a museum files a protest with the county assessor under Subsection A(1) and then pays the disputed tax, in order to avoid interest and penalty assessments, the museum cannot later apply for a refund under Subsection A(2). Georgia O'Keeffe Museum v. County of Santa Fe, 2003-NMCA-003, 133 N.M. 297, 62 P.3d 754.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 72 Am. Jur. 2d State and Local Taxation §§ 795 to 816.
84 C.J.S. Taxation §§ 512 to 559.