N.M. Stat. Ann. § 7-33-4
D. A processor may deduct from the amount of mmbtus of natural gas subject to the tax the mmbtus of natural gas that are:
History: 1953 Comp., § 72-23-4, enacted by Laws 1963, ch. 179, § 4; 1970, ch. 13, § 5; 1984, ch. 2, § 9; 1998, ch. 102, § 2; 2025, ch. 130, § 140.
The 2025 amendment, effective July 1, 2025, removed certain obsolete language; and deleted former Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections D through G as Subsections C through F, respectively.
The 1998 amendment, effective January 1, 1999, deleted "oil and gas accounting division of the taxation and revenue" from the section heading and rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.
"Interest owners" liable under former section. — Under the version of this section in effect prior to its 1998 amendment, the "interest owner" of the natural gas was liable for the privilege tax on processing natural gas. Blackwood & Nichols Co. v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 1998-NMCA-113, 125 N.M. 576, 964 P.2d 137, cert. denied, 126 N.M. 107, 967 P.2d 447 (decided under prior law).
Marketable condition rule does not apply in New Mexico. — Where Appellants, several living trusts that held royalty interests on oil and gas leases (Trusts), brought a putative class action against Defendant, the owner and operator of natural gas wells on the leases, claiming that Defendant was systematically underpaying royalties by improperly deducting from their royalties their proportionate share of the costs incurred to place the gas produced from the wells in a marketable condition (post-production costs), the district court did not err in dismissing the Trusts’ claims, because under New Mexico law, Defendant had a duty to diligently market the gas for the benefit of the Trusts but that duty did not prohibit it from deducting from royalty payments the Trusts’ proportionate share of post-production costs, those costs necessary to make the gas marketable. The marketable condition rule, which requires the lessor to market gas, but to do so solely at its expense, does not apply in New Mexico. Anderson Living Trust v. Energen Resources Corp., 886 F.3d 826 (10th Cir. 2018).
Third-party gas processors may pass tax onto owner and operator of natural gas well who may in turn pass tax onto interest owners. — Where Appellants, several living trusts that held royalty interests on oil and gas leases (Trusts), brought a putative class action against Defendant, the owner and operator of natural gas wells on the leases, claiming that Defendant was systematically underpaying royalties by improperly deducting from their royalties a privilege tax the State of New Mexico imposes on natural gas processors (the natural gas processors tax), the district court did not err in granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, because Subsection A of this section places the responsibility for paying the tax on natural gas processors, but there is nothing in this section that prohibits the processors from passing the tax onto Defendant, the owner and operator of the gas wells, or from Defendant passing the tax onto the interest owners. Anderson Living Trust v. Energen Resources Corp., 886 F.3d 826 (10th Cir. 2018).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 85 C.J.S. Taxation § 973 et seq.