N.M. Stat. Ann. § 7-2A-8.3
History: 1978 Comp., § 7-2A-8.3, enacted by Laws 1983, ch. 213, § 12; 1986, ch. 20, § 43; 1993, ch. 307, § 4; 1993, ch. 309, § 2; 2013, ch. 160, § 4; 2019, ch. 270, § 19.
The 2019 amendment, effective January 1, 2020, completely rewrote the section; in the section heading, added "and consolidated"; and deleted former Subsections A through D and added new Subsections A and B.
Applicability. — Laws 2019, ch. 270, § 59 provided that the provisions of Sections 16 through 22 and 58 of Laws 2019, ch. 270 apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020.
The 2013 amendment, effective July 1, 2013, required combined reporting for certain unitary corporations with a retail facility of more than thirty thousand square feet but that do not have nonretail facilities that employ at least seven hundred fifty employees; in the first sentence, after "combined net income were that of one corporation", added the remainder of the sentence; and added Subsection D.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, rewrote this section to the extent that a detailed comparison was impracticable.
Statutory definition of "unitary corporation" excludes foreign subsidiaries not engaged in trade or business in the United States. — Where the New Mexico taxation and revenue department (department) issued a notice of assessment of corporate income tax on the dividends paid to taxpayer, a publicly traded, multinational corporation engaged in the business of petroleum and natural gas exploration and production, by its foreign subsidiaries for the 2015 reporting period, and where taxpayer timely protested the notice of assessment, arguing that 7-2A-2(Q) NMSA 1978 excluded foreign corporations incorporated in a foreign country and not engaged in trade or business in the United States from the definition of "unitary corporation" for all purposes under the New Mexico Corporate Income and Franchise Tax Act (Act), and therefore its foreign source dividends were not unitary income apportionable to New Mexico, and where the administrative hearing officer concluded that taxpayer and its foreign subsidiaries amounted to a "unitary corporation" under 7-2A-2(Q) NMSA 1978 and that the dividends paid to taxpayer by its foreign subsidiaries were taxable under the Act, the administrative hearing officer erred in determining that the dividends paid to taxpayer by its foreign subsidiaries were subject to the Act, because the legislature excluded foreign corporations from the definition of "unitary corporations". If foreign subsidiaries are excluded from the definition of "unitary corporation," the dividends they pay to domestic parents cannot be included as taxable income. Apache Corp. v. N.M. Tax & Rev. Dep't, 2024-NMCA-080, cert. denied.