N.M. Stat. Ann. § 69-36-7
The commission shall:
A. before June 18, 1994, adopt and file reasonable regulations consistent with the purposes and intent of the New Mexico Mining Act necessary to implement the provisions of the New Mexico Mining Act, including regulations that:
(3) require annual reporting of production information to the commission, which shall be kept confidential if otherwise required by law;
B. adopt regulations for new mining operations that allow the director to select a qualified expert who may:
(4) review and comment on the permit application;
C. adopt regulations that require and provide for the issuance and renewal of permits for new and existing mining operations and exploration and that establish schedules to bring existing mining operations into compliance with the requirements of the New Mexico Mining Act; provided that the term of a permit for a new mining operation shall not exceed twenty years and the term of renewals of permits for new mining operations shall not exceed ten years;
D. adopt regulations that provide for permit modifications. The commission shall establish criteria to determine which permit modifications may have significant environmental impact. Modifications that the director determines will have significant environmental impact shall require public notice and an opportunity for public hearing pursuant to Subsection K of this section. A permit modification to the permit for an existing mining operation shall be obtained for each new discrete processing, leaching, excavation, storage or stockpile unit located within the permit area of an existing mining operation and not identified in the permit of an existing mining operation and for each expansion of such a unit identified in the permit for an existing mining operation that exceeds the design limits specified in the permit. The regulations shall require that permit modifications for such units be approved if the director determines that the unit will:
(3) be sited and constructed in a manner that facilitates, to the maximum extent practicable, contemporaneous reclamation consistent with the closeout plan;
E. adopt regulations that require new and existing mining operations to obtain and maintain permits for standby status. A permit for standby status shall be issued for a maximum term of five years; provided that, upon application, the director may renew a permit for standby status for no more than three additional five-year terms. The regulations shall require that, before a permit for standby status is issued or renewed, an owner or operator shall:
(6) provide an analysis of the economic viability of each unit proposed for standby status;
F. establish by regulation closeout plan requirements for existing mining operations that incorporate site-specific characteristics, including consideration of disturbances from previous mining operations, and that take into account the mining method utilized;
G. establish by regulation a procedure for the issuance of a permit for an existing mining operation and for modifications of that permit to incorporate approved closeout plans or portions of closeout plans and financial assurance requirements for performance of the closeout plans. The permit shall describe the permit area of the existing mining operation and the design limits of units of the existing mining operation based upon the site assessment submitted by the operator. The permit shall contain a schedule for completion of a closeout plan. The permit shall thereafter be modified to incorporate the approved closeout plan or portions of the closeout plan once financial assurance has been provided for completion of the closeout plan or the approved portions of the closeout plan. The permit may be modified for new mining units, expansions beyond the design limits of a unit at an existing mining operation or standby status;
H. establish by regulation permit and reclamation requirements for new mining operations that incorporate site-specific characteristics. These requirements shall, at a minimum:
(8) where sufficient topsoil is present, take measures to preserve it from erosion or contamination and ensure that it is in a usable condition for sustaining vegetation when needed;
I. adopt regulations that establish a permit application process for new mining operations that includes:
(7) cross-sections or plans of the permit area depicting:
(10) pre-mining baseline data as required by regulations adopted by the commission;
J. adopt regulations to coordinate the roles of permitting agencies involved in regulating activities related to new and existing mining operations and exploration, including regulatory requirements, to avoid duplicative and conflicting administration of the permitting process and other requirements;
K. except for regulations enacted pursuant to Subsection L of this section, adopt regulations that ensure that the public and permitting agencies receive notice of each application for issuance, renewal or revision of a permit for a new or existing mining operation, for standby status, or exploration, a variance or an application for release of financial assurance and any inspection prior to the release of financial assurance, including a provision that no action shall be taken on any application until an opportunity for a public hearing, held in the locality of the operation, is provided and that all interested persons shall be given a reasonable chance to submit data, views or arguments orally or in writing and to examine witnesses testifying at the hearing. An additional opportunity for a public hearing may be provided if the applicant makes substantial changes in the proposed action, if there are significant new circumstances or information bearing on the proposed action or if the applicant proposes to substantially increase the scale or substantially change the nature of the proposed action and there is public interest and a request for a public hearing. These regulations shall require at a minimum that the applicant for issuance, renewal or revisions of a permit or a variance or an application for release of financial assurance and any inspection prior to release of financial assurance shall provide to the director at the time of filing the application with the director proof that notice of the application and of the procedure for requesting a public hearing has been:
(6) mailed by certified mail to all persons on a list maintained by the director of individuals and organizations who have requested notice of applications under the New Mexico Mining Act. If the application is determined to be administratively complete by the director, the applicant shall provide to the director timely proof that notice of that determination has been provided by first class mail to everyone who has indicated to the applicant in writing that they desire information regarding the application and to a list maintained by the director of individuals and organizations who have requested notice of applications under the New Mexico Mining Act;
L. adopt regulations to provide for permits, without notice and hearing, to address mining operations that have minimal impact on the environment; provided that such permits shall require general plans and shall otherwise reduce the permitting requirements of the New Mexico Mining Act;
M. establish by regulation a schedule of annual administrative and permit fees, which shall equal and not exceed the estimated costs of administration, implementation, enforcement, investigation and permitting pursuant to the provisions of the New Mexico Mining Act. The size of the operation, anticipated inspection frequency and other factors deemed relevant by the commission shall be considered in the determination of the fees. The fees established pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited in the mining act fund;
N. establish by regulation a continuing process of review of mining and reclamation practices in New Mexico that provides for periodic review and amendment of regulations and procedures to provide for the protection of the environment and consider the economic effects of the regulations;
O. adopt regulations governing the provision of variances issued by the director, stating the procedures for seeking a variance, including provisions for public notice and an opportunity for a hearing in the locality where the variance will be operative, the limitations on provision of variances, requiring the petitioner to present sufficient evidence to prove that failure to grant a variance will impose an undue economic burden and that granting the variance will not result in a significant threat to human health, safety or the environment;
P. provide by regulation that, prior to the issuance of any permit for a new mining operation pursuant to the provisions of the New Mexico Mining Act, the permit applicant or operator:
(2) shall provide to the director a written determination from the secretary of environment stating that the permit applicant has demonstrated that the activities to be permitted or authorized will be expected to achieve compliance with all applicable air and water quality and other environmental standards if carried out as described;
Q. require by regulation that the applicant file with the director, prior to the issuance of a permit, financial assurance. The amount of the financial assurance shall be sufficient to assure the completion of the performance requirements of the permit, including closure and reclamation, if the work has to be performed by the director or a third-party contractor and shall include periodic review to account for any inflationary increases and anticipated changes in reclamation or closure costs. The regulations shall specify that financial requirements shall neither duplicate nor be less comprehensive than the federal financial requirements. The form and amount of the financial assurance shall be subject to the approval of the director as part of the permit application; provided that financial assurance does not include any type or variety of self-guarantee or self-insurance;
R. require by regulation that the permittee may file an application with the director for the release of all or part of the permittee's financial assurance. The application shall describe the reclamation measures completed and shall contain an estimate of the costs of reclamation measures that have not been completed. Prior to release of any portion of the permittee's financial assurance, the director shall conduct an inspection and evaluation of the reclamation work involved. The director shall notify persons who have requested advance notice of the inspection. Interested members of the public shall be allowed to be present at the inspection of the reclamation work by the director.
(2) A person with an interest that is or will be adversely affected by release of the financial assurance may file, with the director within thirty days of the date of the inspection, written objections to the proposed release from financial assurance. If written objections are filed and a hearing is requested, the director shall inform all the interested parties of the time and place of the hearing at least thirty days in advance of the public hearing, and hold a public hearing in the locality of the new or existing mining operation or exploration operation proposed for release from financial assurance. The date, time and location of the public hearing shall be advertised by the director in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality for two consecutive weeks, and all persons who have submitted a written request in advance to the director to receive notices of hearings shall be provided notice at least thirty days prior to the hearing;
S. establish coordinated procedures that avoid duplication for the inspection, monitoring and sampling of air, soil and water and enforcement of applicable requirements of the New Mexico Mining Act, regulations adopted pursuant to that act and permit conditions for new and existing mining operations and exploration. The regulations shall require, at a minimum:
(1) inspections by the director occurring on an irregular basis according to the following schedule:
(5) when the director determines that a pattern of violations of the requirements of the New Mexico Mining Act or of the regulations adopted pursuant to that act or the permit required by that act exists or has existed and, if the director also finds that such violations are caused by the unwarranted failure of the owner or operator to comply with the requirements of that act, regulation or permit or that such violations are willfully caused by the owner or operator, that the director shall immediately issue an order to the owner or operator to show cause as to why the permit should not be suspended or revoked;
T. provide for the transfer of a permit to a successor operator, providing for release of the first operator from obligations under the permit, including financial assurance, following the approved assumption of such obligations and financial assurance by the successor operator;
U. adopt regulations providing that the owner or operator of an existing mining operation or a new mining operation who has completed some reclamation measures prior to the effective date of the regulations adopted pursuant to the New Mexico Mining Act may apply for an inspection of those reclamation measures and a release from further requirements pursuant to that act for the reclaimed areas if, after an inspection, the director determines that the reclamation measures satisfy the requirements of that act and the substantive requirements for reclamation pursuant to the applicable regulatory standards; and
V. develop and adopt other regulations necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes and provisions of the New Mexico Mining Act.
History: Laws 1993, ch. 315, § 7; 1997, ch. 88, § 2; 2014, ch. 32, § 2.
The 2014 amendment, effective March 7, 2014, eliminated the restriction on the release of financial assurances; in Subsection H, Paragraph (2), at the beginning of the sentence, deleted "assure" and added "ensure"; in Subsection H, Paragraph (8), after "contamination and", deleted "assure" and added "ensure"; and in Subsection R, deleted the former second sentence which provided that a permittee could not apply for release of financial assurance more that once per year for each mining operation.
The 1997 amendment, effective June 20, 1997, in the introductory language of Subsection A, substituted "before June 18, 1994" for "within one year of the effective date of the New Mexico Mining Act" at the beginning and "the provisions of the New Mexico Mining Act" for "that Act" near the end; in Subsection K, in the introductory language, added the second sentence and inserted "at the time of the filing of the application with the director" and "and of the procedure for requesting a public hearing" in the last sentence, made a minor stylistic change in Paragraph (4), added "of this application; and" in Paragraph (5), and added Paragraph (6); and, in Subsection S, rewrote Paragraph (1).
Constitutionality of regulations. — Regulations that did not establish a schedule of fees but provided that almost all fees be set on a case-by-case basis were invalid insofar as they did not set a determinate fee. Old Abe Co. v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1995-NMCA-134, 121 N.M. 83, 908 P.2d 776, 120 N.M. 828, 907 P.2d 1009.
Regulations were not impermissibly vague and could not delegate an unbridled discretion in the director, in view of the provisions for both administrative and judicial review of actions of the director, and therefore did not violate due process. Old Abe Co. v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1995-NMCA-134, 121 N.M. 83, 908 P.2d 776, 120 N.M. 828, 907 P.2d 1009.
Regulations granting power to the director, an employee of the commission, were not violative of the separation of powers doctrine. Old Abe Co. v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1995-NMCA-134, 121 N.M. 83, 908 P.2d 776, 120 N.M. 828, 907 P.2d 1009.
The provision authorizing the imposition of fees by the commission did not violate the constitutional prohibition against the imposition of fees by a nonelective body, since the commission is not a political subdivision. Old Abe Co. v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1995-NMCA-134, 121 N.M. 83, 908 P.2d 776, 120 N.M. 828, 907 P.2d 1009.
A definition of "mining" that classified mining operations into different categories did not violate the dictates of equal protection. Old Abe Co. v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1995-NMCA-134, 121 N.M. 83, 908 P.2d 776, 120 N.M. 828, 907 P.2d 1009.
Rulemaking authority. — The commission had authority to adopt a rule imposing a surcharge on certain fees promulgated by it in order to partially reimburse the department of game and fish [department of wildlife] for assistance in implementing the State Mining Act. N.M. Mining Ass'n v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1996-NMCA-098, 122 N.M. 332, 924 P.2d 741.
Fee not a tax. — A surcharge imposed on certain fees for the purpose of reimbursing the department of game and fish [department of wildlife] for assisting in implementing the State Mining Act was a fee, not a tax. N.M. Mining Ass'n v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1996-NMCA-098, 122 N.M. 332, 924 P.2d 741.
Transfer of funds. — Nothing in the Mining Act, the Wildlife Conservation Act (17-2-37 to 17-2-46 NMSA 1978), or other state laws prohibit the transfer of funds derived from fees imposed by the commission to the department of game and fish [department of wildlife] to assist in implementing the Mining Act. N.M. Mining Ass'n v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 1996-NMCA-098, 122 N.M. 332, 924 P.2d 741.
Discretion. — New Mexico mining commission acted within its discretion in ruling that the El Cajete mine was a new mining unit of the Las Conchas mine, rather than a new mining operation; the mines were owned by the same mining company and were substantially interrelated. Rio Grande Chapter of Sierra Club v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 2003-NMSC-005, 133 N.M. 97, 61 P.3d 806.