N.M. Stat. Ann. § 67-8-15
B. Utilities have been authorized by statute for many years to locate their facilities within the boundaries of public roads and streets in this state; because utilities are subject to extensive regulation by state agencies and they are affected with the public interest in that, among other things:
(4) all persons in this state are actual or potential consumers of one or more utility services, and all consumers will be affected by the cost of relocation of their utilities as necessary to accommodate highway improvements.
Public highways are intended principally for public travel and transportation; but they are also intended for proper utility uses in serving the public, as authorized pursuant to the laws of this state, and such utility uses are for the benefit of the public served. Without making use of public ways utility lines could not reach or economically service the adjacent public, particularly in urban areas.
History: 1953 Comp., § 55-7-23, enacted by Laws 1959, ch. 310, § 1.
Payment of nonbetterment costs not unconstitutional. — Laws 1959, ch. 310 (67-8-15 to 67-8-21 NMSA 1978) requiring the state to pay, in certain cases, the nonbetterment costs of relocation made necessary by highway improvement is not unconstitutional. State ex rel. City of Albuquerque v. Lavender, 1961-NMSC-096, 69 N.M. 220, 365 P.2d 652.
Obligation to state not released. — Laws 1959, ch. 310 (67-8-15 to 67-8-21 NMSA 1978) does not constitute a release of an obligation to the state. State ex rel. City of Albuquerque v. Lavender, 1961-NMSC-096, 69 N.M. 220, 365 P.2d 652.
In exercising its police power, the state may legitimately and properly consider the effect, not only upon the entire public, but also upon particular segments thereof, and evolve a plan and scheme which will accomplish the greatest public good at the least expense to those adversely affected. State ex rel. City of Albuquerque v. Lavender, 1961-NMSC-096, 69 N.M. 220, 365 P.2d 652.
Apportionment, not donation. — In the passage of Laws 1959, ch. 310 (67-8-15 to 67-8-21 NMSA 1978), the legislature considered that the construction of interstate highways, through a community, is for the primary benefit of interstate travelers and public transportation facilities making use of such thoroughfares, rather than the citizens of the community itself. The legislature was attempting to aid the citizens of the state of New Mexico, through apportionment of costs of relocation, as distinguished from making any type of donation from the funds of the state. State ex rel. City of Albuquerque v. Lavender, 1961-NMSC-096, 69 N.M. 220, 365 P.2d 652.
The reimbursable provisions of Laws 1959, ch. 310 (67-8-15 to 67-8-21 NMSA 1978), and particularly ch. 310, § 4 (67-8-18 NMSA 1978), are unconstitutional. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 60-59. See State ex rel. City of Albuquerque v. Lavender, 1961-NMSC-096, 69 N.M. 220, 365 P.2d 652.
Law reviews. — For note, "Forest Fire Protection on Public and Private Lands in New Mexico," see 4 Nat. Resources J. 374 (1964).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Electric light or power line in street or highway as additional servitude, 58 A.L.R.2d 525.
Placement, maintenance, or design of standing utility pole as affecting private utility's liability for personal injury resulting from vehicle's collision with pole within or beside highway, 51 A.L.R.4th 602.