N.M. Stat. Ann. § 66-7-347
History: 1953 Comp., § 64-7-347, enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 451.
Cross references. — For the definition of "school bus", see 66-1-4.16 NMSA 1978.
For the penalty assessment for violation of this section's directives, see 66-8-116 NMSA 1978.
For authority to promulgate regulations governing design and operation of school buses, see 22-16-2 and 22–16–11 NMSA 1978.
For covering and removing markings on school buses when used for other than pupil transportation or when sold, see 22-16-9 NMSA 1978.
For using buses for public transportation emergency, see 22-17-1 NMSA 1978 et seq.
Violation of section is negligence per se. — This section was enacted to protect school children boarding or alighting from a school bus from injury from oncoming motorists. Consequently, one who violates it is guilty of negligence per se. Hernandez v. Brooks, 1980-NMCA-056, 95 N.M. 670, 625 P.2d 1187, cert. quashed, 94 N.M. 675, 615 P.2d 992.
School bus itself controls traffic where no traffic-control devices. — The legislature recognized that school buses are usually required to discharge school children at places where there are no traffic controls. It seems clear that, recognizing this fact, the legislature, in order that there always be traffic controls for the safety of school children, provided that the school bus itself should control the traffic where no mechanical or electrical traffic controls are provided. Hayes v. Hagemeier, 1963-NMSC-095, 75 N.M. 70, 400 P.2d 945.
Bus signals not to protect children at traffic-controlled intersections. — It is implicit in Section 64-18-46, 1953 Comp. (similar to this section), that discharged school children shall remain off the traveled portion of the roadway and proceed off the roadway to the pedestrian crosswalk when they are discharged from the bus at a traffic-controlled intersection. Section 64-18-46, 1953 Comp., does not contemplate that the bus signals provide the protection for such discharged children in crossing the roadway at traffic-controlled intersections. Hayes v. Hagemeier, 1963-NMSC-095, 75 N.M. 70, 400 P.2d 945.
Prohibition against passing stopped bus restricted to stops on highway. — The prohibition against passing a stopped bus, set forth in Section 64-18-46, 1953 Comp. (similar to this section), is clearly restricted to stops on a highway for purpose of discharging or receiving children outside a business or residential area. 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 57-235.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 7A Am. Jur. 2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 269.