N.M. Stat. Ann. § 66-2-7.1
A. It is unlawful for any department or bureau employee or contractor or for any former department or bureau employee or contractor to disclose to any person other than another employee of the department or bureau any personal information about an individual obtained by the department or bureau in connection with a driver's license or permit, the titling or registration of a vehicle, the administration of the Ignition Interlock Licensing Act [66-5-501 to 66-5-504 NMSA 1978] and the interlock device fund or an identification card issued by the department pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Code [Articles 1 through 8 of Chapter 66 NMSA 1978, except 66-7-102.1 NMSA 1978] except:
(9) for use by an insured state-chartered or federally chartered credit union; an insured state or national bank; an insured state or federal savings and loan association; or an insured savings bank, but only:
History: 1978 Comp., § 66-2-7.1, enacted by Laws 1995, ch. 135, § 4; 1998, ch. 13, § 1; 1999, ch. 53, § 1; 2000, ch. 29, § 1; 2007, ch. 323, § 31; 2007, ch. 324, § 1; 2025, ch. 138, § 5.
Cross references. — For the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 to 1503.
The 2025 amendment, effective July 1, 2025, prohibited the disclosure of personal information for purposes of enforcing the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, except felony criminal provisions of that act; added Subsections B and C and redesignated former Subsection B as Subsection D.
2007 Amendments. — Laws 2007, ch. 324, § 1, effective June 15, 2007, provided that it is unlawful to disclose information obtained in connection with the administration of the Ignition Interlock Licensing Act and the interlock device fund.
Laws 2007, ch. 323, § 31, effective July 1, 2007, in Paragraph 10 of Subsection A changed the title of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act to the Jonathan Spradling Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act.
The 2000 amendment, effective May 17, 2000, added Subsection A(11) and substituted "sentenced" for "punished" in Subsection B.
The 1999 amendment, effective June 18, 1999, in Subsection A deleted former Paragraph (9), relating to the requirement that the motor vehicle department clearly and conspicuously disclose on any forms that personal information collected by the department may be disclosed to any person and the forms must indicate that there is the opportunity to prohibit such disclosure, redesignated former Paragraph (10) as Paragraph (9), and added Paragraph (10).
The 1998 amendment added Paragraph A(10) and made minor stylistic changes. Laws 1998, ch. 13 contains no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M. Const., art. IV, § 23, is effective on May 20, 1998, 90 days after adjournment of the legislature.
Driver’s license records. — Where plaintiffs, who wanted to research whether undocumented aliens were voting in elections in New Mexico, requested information about driver’s licenses issued to persons who were not citizens or legal residents of the United States, defendants properly redacted individual tax identification numbers and the names, driver’s license numbers, and addresses of drivers who obtained their license with proof of identification other than a social security number because the redacted information was personal information which defendants were prohibited from disclosing by 18 U.S.C. § 2721(a)(1) and by Section 66-2-7.1 NMSA 1978. Republican Party of N.M. v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2010-NMCA-080, 148 N.M. 877, 242 P.3d 444, cert. granted, 2010-NMCERT-008, 148 N.M. 942, 242 P.3d 1288.
Research activities. — Where plaintiffs requested information about driver’s licenses issued to persons who were not citizens or legal residents of the United States for the purpose of challenging voter eligibility; to establish voter fraud, plaintiffs would be required to disclose the personal driver’s license information they received from the motor vehicle records to the persons who are permitted by Section 1-4-22 NMSA 1978 to advance a claim challenging voter eligibility and to the district court; and to verify voter eligibility, plaintiffs would have to use the personal driver’s license information to contact the individuals from whom the personal driver’s license information was obtained, the research exception to confidentiality did not apply. Republican Party of N.M. v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 2010-NMCA-080, 148 N.M. 877, 242 P.3d 444, cert. granted, 2010-NMCERT-008, 148 N.M. 942, 242 P.3d 1288.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Validity, construction and application of federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2721 to 2725. 183 A.L.R. Fed. 37.