N.M. Stat. Ann. § 61-6-15
D. "Unprofessional or dishonorable conduct", as used in this section, means, but is not limited to because of enumeration, conduct of a licensee that includes the following:
(21) failure to report to the board any adverse action taken against the licensee by:
E. As used in this section:
(1) "conversion therapy" means any practice or treatment that seeks to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity, including any effort to change behaviors or gender expressions or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward persons of the same sex. "Conversion therapy" does not mean:
History: 1953 Comp., § 67-5-9; Laws 1969, ch. 46, § 6; 1979, ch. 63, § 3; 1983, ch. 260, § 2; 1978 Comp., § 61-6-14, recompiled as § 61-6-15 by Laws 1989, ch. 269, § 11; 1991, ch. 148, § 3; 1994, ch. 80, § 7; 1997, ch. 221, § 1; 2001, ch. 96, § 4; 2003, ch. 19, § 15; 2005, ch. 159, § 4; 2008, ch. 53, § 12; 2008, ch. 54, § 13; 2017, ch. 132, § 3; 2021, ch. 54, § 34; 2023, ch. 141, § 3.
Repeals. — Laws 1989, ch. 269, § 32 repealed former 61-6-15 NMSA 1978, as amended by Laws 1973, ch. 361, § 7, relating to definition of "practice of medicine" and exceptions from this article, effective July 1, 1989.
The 2023 amendment, effective June 16, 2023, included podiatric physicians within the scope of the section; and in Subsection A, after "naprapathic practitioner", added "or a podiatric physician".
The 2021 amendment, effective June 18, 2021, made the provisions of this section applicable to naturopathic practitioners and naprapathic practitioners, revised the definition of "unprofessional or dishonorable conduct" as used in this section, including removing "criminal abortion" from the definition of "unprofessional or dishonorable conduct"; in Subsection A, after "unable to practice", deleted "medicine" and added "as a physician", after "genetic", deleted "counseling" and added "counselor, a naturopathic practitioner or naprapathic practitioner"; and in Subsection D, Paragraph D(1), after "abetting", deleted "a criminal abortion" and added "an illegal procedure", in Paragraph D(14), after "certified copy of the record of", deleted "suspension or revocation of the state making the suspension or revocation" and added "disciplinary action or sanction taken by another jurisdiction", in Paragraph D(19), after "negligent acts", added "or a pattern of conduct otherwise described in this section or in violation of a board rule", in Paragraph D(22), after "failure to report to the board", added "the denial of licensure", and in Paragraph D(32), after "derived from the", added "current or".
The 2017 amendment, effective June 16, 2017, included the use of conversion therapy on a minor in the list of acts that are deemed unprofessional or dishonorable conduct under this section, provided that the New Mexico medical board may revoke or suspend any license issued by the board if any licensee is guilty of using conversion therapy on a minor, and defined certain terms as used in this section; in Subsection A, after "anesthesiologist assistant", deleted "or"; in Subsection D, added Paragraph D(39); and in Subsection E, added Paragraph E(1) and paragraph designation "(2)" preceding the remaining language from former Subsection E, and added Paragraphs E(3) through E(5).
2008 Amendments. — Laws 2008, ch. 54, § 13, effective July 1, 2008, in Subsection A, after "anesthesiologist assistant", added "or engage in the practice of polysomnography".
Laws 2008, ch. 53, § 12, effective July 1, 2009, in Subsection A, after "anesthesiologist assistant", added "or practice genetic counseling".
The 2005 amendment, effective April 5, 2005, in Subsection D(14), added that "unprofessional or dishonorable conduct" includes the denial of a license by another state; and in Subsection D(28), deleted the qualification that the licensee represent or infer that the activity is a legitimate part of the patient's treatment.
The 2003 amendment, effective June 20, 2003, rewrote this section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.
The 2001 amendment, effective April 2, 2001, inserted "or conviction of a misdemeanor associated with the practice of medicine" in Paragraph D(6).
The 1997 amendment, effective June 20, 1997, substituted "Impaired Health Care Provider Act" for "Impaired Physician Act" at the end of Subsection A, substituted "discipline imposed on a licensee to practice medicine by another state, including probation, suspension or revocation" for "the suspension or revocation by another state of a license to practice medicine" at the beginning of Paragraph D(14), added Paragraph D(30), and made minor stylistic changes in Subsections B and D.
The 1994 amendment, effective May 18, 1994, added the second sentence and added "or the Impaired Physician Act" in the last sentence in Subsection A; substituted "the physician" for "he" in Subsection B; substituted "the" for "his" preceding "period of suspension" and "the physician's" for "his" preceding "license reinstated" in Subsection C; substituted "the physician" for "him" in Subsection D(2); deleted "annual" preceding "renewal" in Subsection D(8); substituted "the physician" for "his" twice and "the physician" for "him" in Subsection D(9); substituted "the physician's" for "his" in Subsection D(10); added "administering or dispensing" following "prescribing" in Subsection D(17); substituted "the physician" for "him" in Subsection D(21); added "administering or dispensing of any drug or medicine" in Subsection D(26); and substituted "for" for "of" following "inducement" in Subsection E.
The 1991 amendment, effective June 14, 1991, in Subsection D, added Paragraphs (27) and (28), redesignated former Paragraph (27) as Paragraph (29) and made a related stylistic change and made a minor stylistic change in Subsection A.
The 1989 amendment, effective July 1, 1989, renumbered this section, which formerly was 61-6-14 NMSA 1978, inserted in the section heading "licensee may be fined, censured or reprimanded", "unprofessional and dishonorable conduct defined", and "fees and expenses"; in Subsection A twice substituted "may" for "shall" and inserted "and may fine, censure or reprimand any licensee" in the first sentence, and deleted "in connection with the issuance, renewal, suspension or revocation of licenses" following "proceedings" in the second sentence; designated the former third and fourth sentences of Subsection A as present Subsection B; designated the former fifth and sixth sentences of Subsection A as present Subsection C, while substituting "61-6-20" for "61-6-18" at the end of the last sentence therein; redesignated former Subsection B as present Subsection D; substituted "confidence" for "secret" in Subsection D(5); substituted all of the present language of Subsection D(8) beginning with "annual" for "an annual registration"; added all of the language of Subsection D(10) following "registration"; substituted the present provisions of Subsection D(15) for "making a fraudulent claim"; added present Subsections D(18) through D(26); redesignated former Subsection D(18) as present Subsection D(27); redesignated former Subsection C as present Subsection E; deleted former Subsection D, relating to hospital report of loss of physician's privilege; added Subsections F and G; redesignated former Subsection E as present Subsection H; in Subsection H substituted "entity" for "company", inserted "or indemnifying physicians for professional liability", and substituted "settlements or judgments" for "malpractice claims"; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
Due process. — Former Subsection D(27) (now Subsection D(29)) of this section, defining "unprofessional or dishonorable conduct" to include conduct unbecoming in one licensed to practice medicine or detrimental to the best interests of the public, is not void for vagueness. McDaniel v. N.M. Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 1974-NMSC-062, 86 N.M. 447, 525 P.2d 374.
Terms of probation not unconstitutionally vague. — Where one of the terms of probation imposed by the board on a physician found guilty of unprofessional conduct for falsely prescribing demerol for the alleged use of another when in fact the drug was for personal use was that the doctor not take or have in the doctor's possession "any dangerous drugs" without the consent of a psychiatrist, and the physician thereafter prescribed the drug ritalin for a patient and diverted some of it for personal use, revocation of the physician's license for violating probation was justified, as under the facts the terms thereof were not unconstitutionally vague. McDaniel v. N.M. Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 1974-NMSC-062, 86 N.M. 447, 525 P.2d 374.
Prior judicial determination unnecessary. — An administrative determination of "unlawful, illegal or unauthorized" conduct sufficient to support a conclusion of "unprofessional conduct," as provided in this section, is not dependent upon a prior judicial determination of criminal guilt. Strance v. N.M. Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 1971-NMSC-081, 83 N.M. 15, 487 P.2d 1085.
Restraint of proceedings. — Board of medical examiners has exclusive jurisdiction regarding the granting and revoking of certificates admitting physicians and surgeons to practice, and as statutes do not provide for disqualification of board members, proceedings before the board may not be restrained merely by reason of the fact that the board itself initiated the proceedings against a physician and was, therefore, an interested party. Seidenberg v. N.M. Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 1969-NMSC-028, 80 N.M. 135, 452 P.2d 469.
Subsection D(5) does not create privilege; it only describes ethical constraints placed upon a physician. Trujillo v. Puro, 1984-NMCA-050, 101 N.M. 408, 683 P.2d 963, cert. denied, 101 N.M. 362, 683 P.2d 44.
Reinstatement after revocation. — Board of medical examiners has the power to suspend a license inherent in its power to revoke, but when revocation is accomplished, the only method of reinstating revoked licensee to full privileges is by the means of reapplication. 1953 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 53-5839.
Under former law, the legislature did not define unprofessional conduct, nor prohibit advertising by physicians; former statute did not go far enough to give power to the board of medical examiners to revoke the license of a physician for advertising unless said advertising was false, immoral and against the public welfare. 1939 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 39-3048.
No lay control of professional medical judgments. — An entity, such as a clinic, hospital or other similar corporate entity employing physicians, may not engage in conduct amounting to the practice of medicine by exerting lay control of professional medical judgments. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-39.
Law reviews. — For article, "New Mexico's 1969 Criminal Abortion Law," see 10 Nat. Res. J. 591 (1970).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 61 Am. Jur. 2d Physicians, Surgeons and Other Healers §§ 74 to 100.
Validity of statute providing for revocation of license of physician or surgeon, 5 A.L.R. 94, 79 A.L.R. 323.
Liquor law, violation of, as infamous crime or offense involving moral turpitude for which physician's license may be revoked, 40 A.L.R. 1049, 71 A.L.R. 217.
Advertising by physician, surgeon or other person professing healing arts, constitutionality of statute or ordinance prohibiting or regulating, 54 A.L.R. 400.
Grounds for revocation of valid license of physician or surgeon, 54 A.L.R. 1504, 82 A.L.R. 1184.
Moral turpitude, what offenses involve, within statute providing grounds for denying license, 109 A.L.R. 1459.
Conviction, what amounts to within statute making conviction ground for refusing license, 113 A.L.R. 1179.
Practice of medicine, dentistry or law through radio broadcasting stations, newspapers or magazines, 114 A.L.R. 1506.
Acquittal or dismissal in criminal prosecution, effect of, on revocation of license of physician, 123 A.L.R. 779.
Statutory power to revoke or suspend license of physician for "unprofessional conduct" as exercisable without antecedent adoption of regulation as to what shall constitute such conduct, 163 A.L.R. 909.
Revocability of license for fraud or other misconduct before or at the time of its issuance, 165 A.L.R. 1138.
Conviction as proof of ground for revocation or suspension of license of physician or surgeon where conviction as such is not an independent cause, 167 A.L.R. 228.
Governing law as to existence or character of offense for which one has been convicted in a federal court or court of another state, as bearing upon his qualification to practice as physician or surgeon, 175 A.L.R. 803.
Professional incompetency as ground for disciplinary measure, 28 A.L.R.3d 487.
Duty of physician or surgeon to warn or instruct nurse or attendant, 63 A.L.R.3d 1020.
Criminal responsibility for physical measures undertaken in connection with treatment of mentally disordered patient, 99 A.L.R.3d 854.
Use, in attorney or physician disciplinary proceeding, of evidence obtained by wrongful police action, 20 A.L.R.4th 546.
Wrongful or excessive prescription of drugs as ground for revocation or suspension of physician's or dentist's license to practice, 22 A.L.R.4th 668.
Imposition of civil penalties, under state statute, upon medical practitioner for fraud in connection with claims under medicaid, medicare, or similar welfare programs for providing medical services, 32 A.L.R.4th 671.
Physician's or other healer's conduct, or conviction of offense, not directly related to medical practice, as ground for disciplinary action, 34 A.L.R.4th 609.
Recovery for emotional distress resulting from statement of medical practitioner or official, allegedly constituting outrageous conduct, 34 A.L.R.4th 688.
Applicability of statute of limitations or doctrine of laches to proceeding to revoke or suspend license to practice medicine, 51 A.L.R.4th 1147.
Improper or immoral sexually related conduct toward patient as ground for disciplinary action against physician, dentist, or other licensed healer, 59 A.L.R.4th 1104.
Filing of false insurance claims for medical services as ground for disciplinary action against dentist, physician, or other medical practitioner, 70 A.L.R.4th 132.
Necessity of expert evidence in proceeding for revocation or suspension of license of physician, surgeon, or dentist, 74 A.L.R.4th 969.
Existence, nature, and application to medical professional disciplinary board of privilege against disclosure of identity of informer, 86 A.L.R.4th 1024.
Liability of doctor or other health practitioner to third party contracting contagious disease from doctor's patient, 3 A.L.R.5th 370.
Rights as to notice and hearing in proceeding to revoke or suspend license to practice medicine, 10 A.L.R.5th 1.
False or fraudulent statements or nondisclosures in application for issuance or renewal of license to practice as ground for disciplinary action against, or refusal to license, medical practitioner, 32 A.L.R.5th 57.
Denial by hospital of staff privileges or referrals to physician or other health care practitioner as violation of Sherman Act (15 USCS § 1 et seq.), 89 A.L.R. Fed. 419.
70 C.J.S. Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Health-Care Providers §§ 24, 35 to 43, 50, 53 to 57.