N.M. Stat. Ann. § 61-11-6
A. The board shall:
B. The board may:
History: 1953 Comp., § 67-9-37, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 29, § 5; 1972, ch. 84, § 55; 1977, ch. 62, § 1; 1979, ch. 293, § 1; 1983, ch. 165, § 1; 1992, ch. 19, § 2; 1997, ch. 131, § 6; 2001, ch. 50, § 4; 2005, ch. 152, § 5; 2022, ch. 39, § 45.
The 2022 amendment, effective May 18, 2022, clarified that the board of pharmacy is required to follow the provisions of the State Rules Act when promulgating rules; in Subsection A, Paragraph A(1), deleted "adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations necessary" and added "promulgate rules in accordance with the provisions of the State Rules Act", in Paragraph A(18), deleted "adopt" and added "promulgate", and after "rules", deleted "and regulations", and in Paragraph A(19), deleted "adopt" and added "promulgate"; and in Subsection B, Paragraph B(2), after "provide by", deleted "regulation" and added "rule".
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, provided in Subsection A(18) that the board shall adopt rules and regulations concerning the provision of emergency prescription dispensing; added Subsection A(20) to permit the board to authorize emergency prescription dispensing; and added Subsection B(3) to permit the board to delegate its authority to the executive director to authorize emergency prescription dispensing procedures during emergencies.
The 2001 amendment, effective June 15, 2001, in Subsection A, deleted "annual" preceding "renewal" in Paragraphs (4) and (5), and added Paragraph (19).
The 1997 amendment, effective June 20, 1997, rewrote Subsection A; redesignated former Subsections B through H as Paragraphs A(2) through A(8), respectively; deleted former Subsection I relating to minor violations of the Pharmacy Act; redesignated former Subsections J through P as Paragraphs A(9) through A(15), respectively; deleted former Subsection Q relating to rules and regulations regarding supportive personnel; redesignated former Subsection R as Paragraph A(18); and added Subsection B.
The 1992 amendment, effective May 20, 1992, substituted "nonresident pharmacies, wholesale drug distributors" for "wholesale drug dealers" near the beginning of Subsection F and inserted "or administered" near the end of that subsection; inserted "Device" in Subsection J; added Subsections Q and R; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
Defendants did not meet the definition of "custodial care facilities," and therefore did not require a pharmacy license. — Where the board of pharmacy notified defendants, two community care homes that provide full-time care, supervision and support to children, that they needed a pharmacy license to maintain their children, youth and families department (CYFD) licenses, claiming that defendants were considered "custodial care facilities" under the Pharmacy Act, §§ 61-11-1 through 61-11-29 NMSA 1978, and where defendants responded that they were not required to hold a pharmacy license because they were not "custodial care facilities," and where defendants filed a complaint in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent their licenses from being revoked, the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting declaratory and injunctive relief in defendants' favor, because defendants did not meet the definition of "custodial care facilities." Defendants' purpose is to provide safe care for certain children, not medical or health care, and the children which defendants care for are not placed there for health care purposes; defendants do not retain nurses or doctors on staff, and do not provide the children with extended health care or prescribe them medications. Defendants are not "custodial care facilities" as contemplated by the Pharmacy Act, but are "community homes," as defined by CYFD regulations, which are not required to obtain a pharmacy license to operate. N.M. Boys & Girls Ranch v. N.M. Bd. of Pharmacy, 2022-NMCA-047, cert. denied.
Pharmacy board exceeded its regulatory authority by expanding the statutory definition of "custodial care facility". — Where the board of pharmacy (board) notified defendants, two community care homes that provide full-time care, supervision and support to children, that they needed a pharmacy license to maintain their children, youth and families department licenses, claiming that defendants were considered "custodial care facilities" under the Pharmacy Act, §§ 61-11-1 through 61-11-29 NMSA 1978, and where defendants responded that they were not required to hold a pharmacy license because they were not "custodial care facilities," and where defendants filed a complaint in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent their licenses from being revoked, the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting declaratory and injunctive relief in defendants' favor, because the board acted outside its statutory authority in defining "custodial care facility" by regulation in a manner that excessively expanded upon the legislature's definition of "custodial care facility" in the Pharmacy Act. The board's definition is therefore void. N.M. Boys & Girls Ranch v. N.M. Bd. of Pharmacy, 2022-NMCA-047, cert. denied.
Board constitutional. — The board is well founded in the police power of the state and cannot be attacked as being unconstitutional. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 60-126.
Constitutionality of regulating nonresident dealers. — This provision gives the board power to license, regulate and impose a reasonable license fee on resident and nonresident wholesale drug dealers and manufacturers distributing their products in the state, and such action will not violate the United States constitution. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-49.
Powers of board. — The board of pharmacy has power to make bylaws, rules and regulations necessary for the protection of the public in the field of pharmacy and may employ chemists, inspectors, agents and clerical administrative help for the proper conduct of its business. 1953 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 53-5776.
Jurisdiction over hospital pharmacies. — The board of pharmacy exercises the same powers over pharmacies or drug dispensaries operated by a hospital as it does over any other drug store or pharmacy, etc., operated within the state. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 60-126.
Presence of pharmacist. — Under broad grant of authority given the board for the protection of public health and welfare, it may promulgate a regulation requiring that a registered pharmacist must be on duty in a drug store from the opening hour of the drug store until the closing hour. 1961 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 61-85.
Sharing office space. — The pharmaceutical association and the state board of pharmacy could maintain offices under the same roof and within the same office space, but they would be required to separate their expenditures for rent and clerical help. 1953 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 53-5776.
Inspector. — Inspector appointed under former law, in the performance of duties, was empowered with all of the powers and duties of law enforcement officers of the state, within which powers was the right to carry such weapons as the occasion appeared to require. 1965 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 65-93.
An inspector has all of the authority granted to municipal, county and state law enforcement officers, including the power to obtain search warrants in all cases concerning the violation or violations of the pharmacy laws of the state of New Mexico. 1953 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 53-5865 (rendered under former law).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 28 C.J.S. Drugs and Narcotics § 8 et seq.